National Human Rights Commission Through Its Secretary General vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
1 Dec 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
NITEM NO.32 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1012/2014 NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for interim relief and office report) Date : 08/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Akanksha Kaushik,Adv. Ms. Shobha,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms.Purnima Krishna,Adv. Mr. Abhinav Mukerji,Adv. Mr.S.C.Ghosh,Adv. Mr.Parijat Sinha,Adv. Mr.Sapam Biswajit Meitei,Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Ashok Panigrahi,Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv. Ms.Nandini Gupta,Adv. Mr.Sumanta S.Bandyopadhyay,adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Ms.Varsha Poddar,Adv. Mr. Gopal Singh,Adv. Mr. Milind Kumar,Adv. ⬠¦ .......2 ITEM NO.32 -2- WC1012/2014 Mr.Vikas Bansal,Adv. Mr. Mishra Saurabh,Adv. Mr.Jayant Patel,adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr.Pragyan Sharma,Adv. Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran,Adv. Mr.Vibhu Tiwari,Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra,Adv. Mr.Ujjwal Jain,adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh,Adv. Mohd.Waquas,Adv. Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh,Adv. Ms.Vartika Sahay,Adv. M/s Corporate Law Group,Adv. Mr.K.V.Jagdishvaran,Adv. Ms. G. Indira,Adv. Ms.Vinakshi Kadan,Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. M/s. K. J. John & Co.,Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew,Adv. Mr.Pratap Venugopal,adv. Mr.Aman Shukla,adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The respondent Nos.1,3,7,9,12,20,25,28,29 & 36 have already filed the counter affidavit. ⬠¦ ..........3 ITEM NO.32 -3- WC1012/2014 The respondent Nos.4-6,8,11,14,15,19,21,23,27,30,32 & 34 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. The respondent No.17 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. Ld.counsel for the respondent No.37 has already filed the
counter affidavit but he has failed to file the vakalatnama. Therefore, the counter affidavit filed by him on behalf of the respondent No.37 is taken off the record. Service is complete. Service of notice is complete on the other respondents, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 14.10.2015 of this Court in respect of the respondent No.26 & 35. List the matter again on 29.03.2016. (M V RAMESH)
Registrar
SB