Vjil Consulting Ltd vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Chief Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.3 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IA 2/2013 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13954/2012 (From the judgement and order dated 03/04/2012 in CRP No.1384/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD) LANCO HILLS TECHNOLOGY PARK PVT.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DARGAH HAZRATH HUSSAIN SHAH VALI & ORS. Respondent(s) (for directions and with prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 26/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR For Petitioner(s) Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr Adv. Mr. Akhil Sibal, Adv. Mr. Deepak Khurana, Adv. Ms. Aditi Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Umesh Kumar Khaitan,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. G.E.Vahanvati, AG Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Adv. Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr Ejaz Maqbool, Adv. Mr. Shafiq Mahajir, Adv. Mr. M. Prabhakar, Adv. Ms. Tanima Kishore, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv. Ms. Laxmi Arvind, Adv. Ms. Poonam Prasad, Adv Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mathur, Adv. Mr. Amar Deep Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.W. A. Qadri, Adv. Ms. Tanim Qadri, Adv. Mr. Zaid Ali, Adv. for Mr. Lakshmi Raman Singh ,Adv Mr. S. S. Swaminadhan, Adv. Mr. Ram Gupta, Adv. Ms. Shagufa, Adv. Mr Anil Kumar Tandale ,Adv Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad ,Adv Mr. R. Venkatramani, Sr. Adv. Mr. G.N.Reddy ,Adv Mr. B. Debojit, Adv. Mr. Bala Shivudu M, Adv. Ms. Neelam Singh, Adv.
Ö
Mr. Sunil Fernandes ,Adv R-11 Mr. Ravindra Shrivasatava, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kunal Verma ,Adv Mr. Sameer Shrivastava, Adv. Mr. Harneet, Adv.
Mr. Atul Sharma, Adv Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard learned Attorney General and learned senior counsel for the parties.
It is clarified that henceforth any transaction entered into by the petitioner shall be subject to the final adjudication in the present Special Leave Petition. It is also clarified that for any transaction that the petitioner may henceforth enter, the pendency of the above matter and the interim order that was passed by this Court on 8.5.2012 shall be intimated to the concerned party. I.A. No. 2 of 2013 stands disposed of accordingly.
|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) |
|Court Master | |Court Master |