Vjil Consulting Ltd vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Chief Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.4 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IA 2/2013 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).13954/2012 (From the judgement and order dated 03/04/2012 in CRP No.1384/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF A.P AT HYDERABAD) LANCO HILLS TECHNOLOGY PARK PVT.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS DARGAH HAZRATH HUSSAIN SHAH VALI & ORS. Respondent(s) (for directions and with prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 10/05/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH For Petitioner(s) Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr Adv. Mr. Akhil Sibal, Adv. Mr. Deepak Khurana, Adv. Ms. Aditi Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Umesh Kumar Khaitan,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R.F. Nariman, Sr. Adv Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr Ejaz Maqbool, Adv. Mr. M. Prabhakar, Adv. Ms. Tanima Kishore, Adv. for Mr. Ejaz Maqbool,Adv. Mr. U.U. Lalit, Sr. Adv. Mr. G. Pramod Kumar, Adv. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Adv Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv. Ms. Laxmi Arvind, Adv. Ms. Poonam Prasad, Adv Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mathur, Adv. Dr. Rajiv Dhawan, Sr. Adv. Mr. S.W. A. Qadri, Adv. Ms. Tanim Qadri, Adv. for Mr. Lakshmi Raman Singh ,Adv Mr. S. S. Swaminadhan, Adv. Mr. Sugam Seth, Adv. Ms. Shagufa, Adv. Mr Anil Kumar Tandale ,Adv Mr. Shaikh Chand Saheb, Adv. Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad ,Adv Mr. R. Venkatramani, Sr. Adv. Mr. G.N.Reddy ,Adv Mr. B. Debojit, Adv.
´
Mr. Atul Sharma, Adv Mr Milanka Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Agnihotri, Adv. Mr. Mehul Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes ,Adv
Mr. Kunal Verma ,Adv
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
As per office report, service is incomplete on respondent Nos. 6 to 8, 10, 11, 15 to 17 in SLP (C) No. 13954 of 2012.
It is also stated that in the connected matters, service is incomplete on respondent No. 2 in SLP (C) No 13956 of 2012, common respondent Nos. 2 & 5 in SLP (C) Nos 29800 and 29801 of 2012, respondent No. 3 in SLP (C) No. 15399 of 2012, respondent No. 1 in SLP (C) No. 30104 of 2012 and respondent Nos. 3,4,6, 12 to 15 in SLP (C) No. 34590 of 2012.
Advocates-on-record for the petitioners in the above Special Leave Petitions shall take fresh steps for effecting service on unserved respondents within ten weeks from today. Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process is permitted.
List the matter on July 26, 2013.
|(Pardeep Kumar) | |(Renu Diwan) |
|Court Master | |Court Master |