Satilila Sehkari Awas Samiti Ltd vs. Union Of India & Ors Etc. Etc

\222" ITEM NO.85 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XVII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL

Civil Appeal No(s). 5618/2015

SAS REALTORS PVT. LTD. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

S.P. MUTHURAMAN & ORS Respondent(s) (with office report)

WITH C.A. No. 7191-7192/2015

(With appln.(s) for modification of court's order and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for stay and appln.(s) for clarification of court's order and Office Report)

C.A. No. 9108/2015

(With appln.(s) for may refer to remarks and appln.(s) for stay and Office Report)

C.A. No. 13842-13843/2015

(With Office Report)

Date : 09/03/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

For Appellant(s) Mr. Ashwin Kumar D.S, Adv. Mr. D. L. Chidananda,Adv. Mr. Pravin K. Hota, Adv. Ms. Rohini Musa,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma,Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv.

Signature Not Verified

Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma,Adv. Mr. T. V. S. Raghavendra Sreyas,Adv.

Digitally signed by Rajni Mukhi Date: 2016.03.10 16:37:26 IST

Reason: Ms. Gayatri Gulati, Adv. Mr. V. Balaji, Adv. Mr. Sripradha Krishnan, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5618/2015

Service is complete but the respondents have not filed counter affidavit despite expiry of statutory period and though respondent no. 1 has filed but after the expiry of statutory period. As such,

Registry to make a specific mention in the office report at the time of listing.

The appellant has already filed an application for directions but learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that he wants to withdraw the application.

As such, Registry to process the matter for listing before Hon'ble Court.

CIVIL APPEAL NOS.7191-7192/2015 and 7193-7194/2015 Respondent no. 1 has already filed counter affidavit Despite last opportunity having been granted, respondent nos.

2-4 have not filed counter affidavit, as such, further opportunity is declined.

Four weeks time, as last opportunity is granted to respondent no. 6 for filing counter affidavit.

Two weeks time, as last opportunity is granted for taking fresh steps for service of respondent nos. 3, 5, 7-9 in CA No. 7193-7194/2015. Notice be issued thereafter.

CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9108/2015 and 9124-9125/2015 Respondent no. 1 has filed counter affidavit. Two weeks time is granted for taking fresh steps for service

of respondent nos. 2-9. Notice be issued thereafter. CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 9124-9125/2015

Two weeks time is granted for taking fresh steps for service of respondent nos. 2-5 and 7-9. Notice be issued thereafter. Respondent no. 1 has already filed counter affidavit Four weeks time, as last opportunity is granted to respondent no. 6 for filing counter affidavit.

CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 13842-13843/2015 and 13844-13845/2015

Four weeks time is granted to respondent nos. 1 and 5 for filing counter affidavit.

However, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 5 submits that she has already filed counter affidavit. Registry to

verify and if so, be taken on record.

Two weeks time is granted for taking fresh steps for service of respondent nos. 2-4 and 6-9. Notice be issued thereafter.

List again on 07.07.2016.

(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar