IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL D. NO.(S). 9108 OF 2015

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

ELURI NAGESHWAR RAO (HAV GD) Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Heard.

There is an inordinate delay of 564 days in the filing of this application for leave to appeal for which no cogent explanation is forthcoming from the petitioners-U.O.I.

The prayer for condonation is accordingly declined and the application for leave to appeal dismissed on the ground of limitation.

The question of law sought to be raised is however left open.

......................J. (T.S. THAKUR)

......................J. (R. BANUMATHI)

NEW DELHI DATED 8th May, 2015.

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal Diary No(s). 9108/2015

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

ELURI NAGESHWAR RAO (HAV GD) Respondent(s)

(With appln. (s) for leave to appeal u/s 31(1) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 and office report)

Date : 08/05/2015 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

For Appellant(s) Mr. R. Balasubramanian,Adv. Ms. S. Usha Reddy,Adv. Mr. Amitesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Pranav kumar,Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Heard.

There is an inordinate delay of 564 days in the filing of this application for leave to appeal for which no cogent explanation is forthcoming from the petitioners-U.O.I.

The prayer for condonation is accordingly declined and the application for leave to appeal dismissed on the ground of limitation.

The question of law sought to be raised is however left open.

(MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file)