S. Vinitha vs. Union Of India

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 37307/2024

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-03-2024 in WP No. 5583/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras)

S. VINITHA & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

( IA No.192896/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.192898/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.192895/2024-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..))

Date: 06-09-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nikhil Nayyar, Sr. Adv. Mr. T. Sai Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Baijal, AOR Mr. Saravanan Rajendran, Adv.

For Respondent( $s$ )

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

1. Permission to file special leave petition(s) is granted.

2. Delay condoned.

notice limited 3. Issue for examining $\tau$ when the $\mathbf{as}$ respondent(s) propose(s) to start the recruitment process, $\mathbf{in}$ pursuance of the directions issued by the High Court.

Dasti service, in addition, is granted. 4.

$5.$ In addition to the usual mode, liberty is granted to the petitioners to serve notice through the Standing Counsel for the $\mathbf{R}^{\bullet}$ pondent(s).

ֱ״הּ<br>הׂה It is stated by the learned senior counsel for the petitioners that Respondent Nos.3 to 54 have filed a special leave petition in this Court. Therefore, liberty is granted to the petitioners to

SECTION XII

Respondent(s)

serve notice upon Respondent Nos.3 to 54 through their Advocate-on-Record in the said special leave petition i.e. SLP(C) No.16935/2024.

7. Tag with SLP(C) No. 16935/2024.

(NARENDRA PRASAD) (ANJU KAPOOR) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER