The State Of Telangana vs. Titan Intech Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Aniruddha Bose, Hon'ble Sudhanshu Dhulia
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Leave Granted / Rule NISI / Appeal Admitted, List On (Date) [22-03-2023]
Listed On:
3 Mar 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REGISTRAR COURT. 2
SECTION XII-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. PAVANESH D.
IA 127745/2022, in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). $15346 - 15388/2022$
THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
M/S SRI SRI ENGINEERING WORKS
Respondent $(s)$
IA No. 127745/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
WTTH
SLP(C) No. 20997/2022 (IX) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.176817/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING <pre>C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)</pre>
$SLP(C)$ No. 1910/2023 (XII-A)
(IA No.13460/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.13464/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.13467/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
SLP(C) No. 1962/2023 (XII-A) (IA No.205060/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.205061/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.205062/2022-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
SLP(C) No. 2010/2023 (XII-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.6248/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.6254/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.6257/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
SLP(C) No. 2011/2023 (XII-A) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.9179/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.9182/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.9184/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) Signature Not Verified
<table>Digital Structure (C) No. 15830/2022 (IX)
$\begin{array}{c}\n\text{Data. 20280.} \ 10:48:10 \quad \text{IST} \ \text{Rossenv.}\n\end{array}$
SLP(C) No. 15685/2022 (IX)
SLP(C) No. 18603/2022 (IX) IA No. 157843/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Date : 01-02-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Aditeya Bali, Adv. Ms. Kavita Jha, AOR Mr. Somanadri Goud Katam, AOR Mehaak Jaggi, Adv. Meehak Jaggi, Adv. Mr. Sirajuddin, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Soayib Qureshi, AOR Mr. Sameer Jain, Adv. Ms. Anu Sura, Adv. Mr. K. K. Mani, AOR Ms. T.archana, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Gupta, Adv. Mr. Vinay Rajput, Adv. Mr. R. Jawaharlal, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Bawa, Adv. Mr. Anuj Garg, Adv. Mr. Mohit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Mayank Kshirsagar, AOR Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Ms. Shwetal Shepal, Adv. Mr. Siddharath Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Ms. Kirti Dadheech, Adv. Dr. M.v.k Moorthy, Adv. Mr. Hitendra Nath Rath, AOR Mr. Abhisek Pati, Adv. Mr. Abhas Kumar, Adv. Mr. R Sree Ramulu, Adv. Mr. Ishaan George, AOR Mr. Ramesh Allanki, Adv. Ms. Aruna Gupta, AOR Mr. Syed Ahmad Naqvi, Adv. Mr. Vikas Bansode, Adv. Mr. Vundavalli Aruna Kumar, Adv. Mr. Desam Sudhakarareddy, Adv. Mr. Vikash Chandra Shukla , AOR Mr. V.c. Shukla, Adv. Mr. Pushpraj Singh Parihar, Adv. Mr. Nitesh Ranjan, Adv. Mr. Piyush Singh, Adv.
Mr. Sumanth Nookala, AOR Mr. Sunil Prakash Pandey, Adv. Mr. Sandeep, Adv. Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Adv. Ms. Simran Sadyora, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following
O R D E R
SLP(C) Nos. 2011/2023, 20997/2022, 15830/2022, 15685/2022, 18603/2022
Vakalatnama has been filed in respect of all the respondents in above matters. Four weeks time, is granted to respondents to file counter affidavit.
List again on 17.03.2023.
SLP(C) Nos. 1910/2023, 1962/2023, 2010/2023
Notice has been issued to sole respondent in all the above matters. Await service. In addition, service of notice on the sole respondent through Dasti, as requested, is permitted.
List again on 17.03.2023.
SLP(C) Nos. 15346-88/2022
Office report states that Ld. Counsel for petitioner has failed to take fresh steps in respect of all unserved respondents though fresh particulars has been filed. However, Ld. Counsel for petitioner submits that fresh steps are already taken. Registry to verify the same and if so, proceed further.
If fresh steps are not taken, two weeks time, is granted to Ld. Counsel for petitioner to take fresh steps. In addition, service of notice on the unserved respondents through Dasti, as requested, is permitted.
For appearing respondents, who have not filed counter affidavit so far, four weeks time is granted to file the same.
List again on 17.03.2023.