Yakkoob P vs. Babitha Babu A

ITEM NO.10

COURT NO.5 $\mathbf{5}$

SECTION XI-A

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) ....................................

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-03-2023 in WA No.1679/2022 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam)

SOUMYA MP & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.

Respondent $(s)$

No.238419/2023-CONDONATION $OF$ DELAY FILING and $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ $(IA)$ $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{N}$ No.238417/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT No. 238418/2023-EXEMPTION FROM $\quad\text{and}\quad$ $\quad\text{and}\quad$ $\mathbf{T}\mathbf{A}$ FTI TNG $0. T$ $TA$ No.238416/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..))

Date: 28-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA

For Petitioner(s)	Mr. Harish Beeran, Adv.
	Mr. Azhar Assees, Adv.
	Mr. Radha Shyam Jena, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$

The application for permission to file the Special Leave 1. Petition is allowed.

$\mathbf{2}$ Delav condoned.

3. Issue notice.

ature Not Verified

4. Tag with SLP(C)No.9566/2023.

petitioners, who Meanwhile, the provisionally are appointed teachers may not be relieved, provided that there are sufficient vacancies appointment $\mathbf{f}$ or the of specially-abled candidates as directed in SLP(C)No.9566/2023.

6. The directions issued earlier to complete the process of appointment of specially-abled candidates be complied with without disturbing the appointment of the petitioners.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)