Meghalaya Commercial Truck Owner And Association President vs. The State Of Meghalaya The State Of Meghalaya Chief Secretary

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble A.K. Sikri
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:22 Jul 2011
CNR:SCIN010370722010

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M EC O U R T<br>O F<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSI N D I A
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2202-2204/2011
(From the judgement and order dated 24/08/2010 in WP No. 2275/2004 &<br>WP No. 2398/2008 & WP No. 2421/2008<br>of The HIGH COURT OF<br>GUWAHATI,ASSAM)
MEGHALAYA COMMERCIAL TRUCK OWNER ASSOCIAPetitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORSRespondent(s)
(With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and prayer<br>for interim relief and office report)
Date: 22/07/2011<br>These Petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :<br>HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE
For Petitioner(s)Mr. Subhro Sanyal,Adv.
For Respondent(s)Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Akshat Hansaria, Adv.<br>Mr. Shankar Divate, Adv.
Respnent nos. 1-5Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, Adv.<br>Ms. S. Bhowmick, Adv.<br>Mr. S.C. Ghosh, Adv.
Mr. Satya Mitra,Adv.
Respondent nos.<br>7,8,9,11, 14Mr.<br>U. Hazarika, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr.<br>H.S. Thankiew, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr.<br>P. Nongliri, Adv.<br>Ms.<br>Dharitry Phookan, Adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R
SLP(C) no. 2202/2011
Respondent nos. 1 to 5 are represented by the standing<br>counsel for Meghalaya, Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee.<br>So far as<br>respondent no. 6 is concerned, it is represented by Mr. Shankar<br>Divate. Respondent no. 7,8, 9 and 10 are represented by<br>-2-
Ms. Dharitry Phookan.<br>Let the counter affidavit be filed, if

¨ITEM NO.5 Court No.13 SECTION III

not filed already, within four weeks as a last opportunity. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, shall be filed within four weeks thereafter.

SLP(C) no. 2203/2011

One of the respondents, namely, respondent no. 4 is not served. Steps shall be taken within a week for getting the service effected on the said respondent which shall be sent by registered post with acknowledgement due.

Let these matters be re-renotified for final hearing on a

non-miscellaneous day in the month of October, 2011.

(DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (RENU DIWAN) Court Master Court Master

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(18) - 25 Oct 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 25 Sept 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 7 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 16 May 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 18 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 18 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 8 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 8 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 1 Apr 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 19 Nov 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 6 Sept 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 1 Mar 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 1 Feb 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 7 Dec 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 19 Jan 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 22 Jul 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(2) - 8 Apr 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 4 Feb 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data