Gokul Patnaik vs. Union Of India Through Its Secretary Ministry Of Finance (Department Of Revenue)
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
TTEM NO. $15$
COURT NO.11
SECTION XT $-A$
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15804/2017
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-01-2017 in WA No. 2349/2016 in W.P. (C) No. 26290 of 2014 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam)
ROJER MATHEW
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD AND ORS CHIEF MANAGER & ORS. Respondent(s)
Date: 24-10-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.
$CORAM :$
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. Renjith B. Marar, Adv. Mr. Lakshmi N. Kaimal, AOR Ms. Vasudha Gupta, Adv.
- For Respondent(s) Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. Mr. P. I. Jose, AOR Mr. Shashank Mishra, Adv. Ms. P.S. Chandralekha, Adv.
- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
Heard.
During the course of hearing our attention has been invited to the issue of appointment norms and functioning of Debt Recovery Tribunals. is pointed out that the It appointment process and the functioning as provided under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 is not as per the observations in the judgments of this Court to uphold the Signature Not Verified pependence of judiciary.
10:22:02 IST<br>Reason: Learned counsel for the parties may address the Court in greater detail.
Post on Tuesday, the 31<sup>st</sup> October, 2017.
We also request Mr. Arvind P. Datar, learned senior counsel, to assist the Court on the above aspect as amicus.
(MAHABIR SINGH) (PARVEEN KUMARI PASRICHA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER