K. Radhakrishnan vs. Women Lawyers Association Rep. By Ms. V. Nalini Secretary

ðITEM NO.28 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVIA

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH

TRANSFER PETITION (CRL.) NO(s). 275 OF 2010

M.RAMASUBRAMANI Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

REGISTRAR MADRAS HIGH CORUT Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for stay,PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and office report ) WITH TP(CRL.) NO.277/2010 Date: 27/09/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. L.K. Pandey,Adv. Mr K Rajeev, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. R. Nedumaran,Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

The learned Advocate, Mr R Nedumaran for the sole respondent in both transfer petitions says that they do not want to file counter affidavit.

He is referring to letter dated 23.9.2010 of the Registrar General of High Court conveying that the High Court will abide by whatever direction issued by the Supreme Court.

He is requested to file such letter on record.

List before the Hon'ble Court at the earliest, as per

rules. (S.G.SHAH) Registrar

hj