SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9792/2017

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-05-2016 in WC No. 22576/2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad)

RAVI PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA. & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

Respondent $(s)$

VERSUS

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

(IA No. 69796/2022 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 13360/2020 - APPLICATION FOR TRANSPOSITION IA No. 188678/2019 - APPLICATION FOR TRANSPOSITION IA No. 133515/2022 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 106640/2017 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 133509/2022 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 124744/2021 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 133504/2022 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 133495/2022 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION IA No. 101089/2021 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION IA No. 2/2017 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS IA No. 32854/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 98779/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 98910/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 107733/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 110196/2022 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA No. 87910/2021 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA No. 9559/2020 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA No. 142809/2021 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA No. 188654/2019 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA No. 110207/2022 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA No. 101087/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 125047/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 134469/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 124993/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 103089/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 124987/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT Signature No. 98909/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT No. 124741/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT 16:53:54<br>Reason: HA No. 112145/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 112130/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 125057/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 146121/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 11113/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL

COURT NO.8

ITEM NO.24

DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 83985/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 69802/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 107732/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 2/2017 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) WITH SLP(C) No. 15548/2017 (XI) (IA No. 106669/2017 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS) Date : 09-01-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN For Petitioner(s) Ms. Pyoli, AOR Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. Mr. Somesh Chandra Jha, AOR Mr. Shreay Saini, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar Raizada, A.A.G. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, AOR Mr. Navin Prakash, AOR Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Binay Kumar Das, AOR Mr. Vipin Kumar Saxena, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Das, Adv. Ms. Neha Das, Adv. Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv. Ms. Ridhima Singh, Adv. Ms. Anamika Yadav, Adv. Ms. Indra Sawhney, AOR Mr. Sonal Jain, AOR Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, Adv. Mr. Udayan Jain, Adv. Ms. Kajal Sharma, Adv. Ms. Shrutika Garg, Adv.

Ms. Heena Sharma, Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Victor Das, Adv. Mr. Chirag Nayak, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Shiv Ram Sharma, AOR Mr. Himanshu Munshi, AOR Mr. Siddhant Munshi, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Munshi, Adv. Mr. Anitesh Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai, AOR Mr. Vipul Jai, Adv. Mrs. Gurinder Jai, Adv. Ms. Sanjna Dua, Adv. Mrs. Anju Jain, Adv. Ms. Anju Jain, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Sachar, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Sachaar, Adv. Mr. Anuj Bhandari, AOR Mr. Anuj Bhandari, Adv. Mr. S. R. Setia, AOR Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR Mr. Somesh Chandra Jha, AOR Mr. Shreay Saini, Adv. Ms. Pyoli, AOR Mr. Tarang Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Sourabh Jena, Adv. Mr. Mrigank Kumar, Adv. Ms. Gulafsha Kureshi, Adv. Mr. Gautam Prabhakar, Adv. Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, AOR Mr. Rajesh Singh Chauhan, AOR Mr. Pritish Narayan Ray, Adv. Mr. Virendra Pratap Singh, Adv. Ms. Shubra Prashar, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Malik, Adv. Ms. Vagisha Nandini, Adv.

Mr. Ravi Prakash, AOR Mr. Neeraj Kumar Verma, AOR Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv. Mr. Onkar Nath, Adv. Mr. Anuj Mirdha, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. Govind Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Shukla, Adv. Mr. O. P. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ashwarya, Adv. Mr. Aryan Sinha, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Malhotra, AOR Mr. Jeetender Gupta, AOR Mr. Pramod Dayal, AOR Mr. Nikunj Dayal, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. Ms. Ankita Kedia, Adv. Mr. Harikesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Sinhmar, Adv. Ms. Mandeera Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar, AOR Mr. Gaurav Goel, AOR Mr. Vivek Malik, Adv. Mr. Vivek Sinha, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Mrs. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr. K.S. Subramanyam, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Rajora, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Ms. Ritika Raj, Adv. Ms. Komal, Adv. Ms. Niharika Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Ajay Mishra, Adv. Mr. Vipin Gupta, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R

Pursuant to our order 18.10.2023 and the subsequent order dated 21.11.2023, extending the time, Mr. Ravindra Kumar and Mr. Vishwajit Singh, learned Senior Advocates appearing on behalf of the Greater NOIDA and Uttar Pradesh Awas Vikas Parishad, respectively, have stated that the said respondents have already inspected the site, and technically, they feel it appropriate that there should be a structural audit to be conducted by an expert agency, like Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi or any other institute of equal competence for that matter, and for the said purpose, they would require eight weeks' time.

Although, there is opposition by Ms. Meenaskhi Arora, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner(s) with respect to the time sought before us, but considering the nature of expert report, which is sought to be obtained, we deem it appropriate to grant eight weeks' time to the respondents.

It is ensured by the learned counsel for the aforesaid respondents that the respondents will immediately start the exercise of getting the structural audit, and they further assured the Court that they would submit the report by the next date of hearing.

We would also request the agency engaged by the respondents for the purpose of structural audit to make endevour to submit the report within time as fixed by this Court.

The matter may be listed on 05.03.2024.

(BABITA PANDEY) (RANJANA SHAILEY) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

5

ITEM NO.24 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 9792/2017

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-05-2016 in WC No. 22576/2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad)

RAVI PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA . & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No. 69796/2022 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 13360/2020 - APPLICATION FOR TRANSPOSITION IA No. 188678/2019 - APPLICATION FOR TRANSPOSITION IA No. 133515/2022 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 106640/2017 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 133509/2022 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 124744/2021 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 133504/2022 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS IA No. 133495/2022 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION IA No. 101089/2021 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION IA No. 2/2017 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS IA No. 32854/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 98779/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 98910/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 107733/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 110196/2022 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA No. 87910/2021 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA No. 9559/2020 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA No. 142809/2021 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA No. 188654/2019 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA No. 110207/2022 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION IA No. 101087/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 125047/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 134469/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 124993/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 103089/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 124987/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 98909/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 124741/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 112145/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 112130/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 125057/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 146121/2022 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT IA No. 11113/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

IA No. 83985/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 69802/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 107732/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 2/2017 - PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES) WITH SLP(C) No. 15548/2017 (XI) (IA No. 106669/2017 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS) Date : 09-01-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN For Petitioner(s) Ms. Pyoli, AOR Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. Mr. Somesh Chandra Jha, AOR Mr. Shreay Saini, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar Raizada, A.A.G. Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, AOR Mr. Navin Prakash, AOR Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Binay Kumar Das, AOR Mr. Vipin Kumar Saxena, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Das, Adv. Ms. Neha Das, Adv. Mr. Vishwajit Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Pankaj Singh, Adv. Ms. Ridhima Singh, Adv. Ms. Anamika Yadav, Adv. Ms. Indra Sawhney, AOR Mr. Sonal Jain, AOR Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, Adv. Mr. Udayan Jain, Adv. Ms. Kajal Sharma, Adv. Ms. Shrutika Garg, Adv. Ms. Heena Sharma, Adv.

Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Victor Das, Adv. Mr. Chirag Nayak, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Shiv Ram Sharma, AOR Mr. Himanshu Munshi, AOR Mr. Siddhant Munshi, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Munshi, Adv. Mr. Anitesh Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai, AOR Mr. Vipul Jai, Adv. Mrs. Gurinder Jai, Adv. Ms. Sanjna Dua, Adv. Mrs. Anju Jain, Adv. Ms. Anju Jain, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Sachar, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Sachaar, Adv. Mr. Anuj Bhandari, AOR Mr. Anuj Bhandari, Adv. Mr. S. R. Setia, AOR Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR Mr. Somesh Chandra Jha, AOR Mr. Shreay Saini, Adv. Ms. Pyoli, AOR Mr. Tarang Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Sourabh Jena, Adv. Mr. Mrigank Kumar, Adv. Ms. Gulafsha Kureshi, Adv. Mr. Gautam Prabhakar, Adv. Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, AOR Mr. Rajesh Singh Chauhan, AOR Mr. Pritish Narayan Ray, Adv. Mr. Virendra Pratap Singh, Adv. Ms. Shubra Prashar, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Malik, Adv. Ms. Vagisha Nandini, Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash, AOR

Mr. Neeraj Kumar Verma, AOR Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv. Mr. Onkar Nath, Adv. Mr. Anuj Mirdha, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. Govind Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Shukla, Adv. Mr. O. P. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ashwarya, Adv. Mr. Aryan Sinha, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Malhotra, AOR Mr. Jeetender Gupta, AOR Mr. Pramod Dayal, AOR Mr. Nikunj Dayal, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv. Ms. Ankita Kedia, Adv. Mr. Harikesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Sinhmar, Adv. Ms. Mandeera Sinhmar, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar, AOR Mr. Gaurav Goel, AOR Mr. Vivek Malik, Adv. Mr. Vivek Sinha, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Mrs. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr. K.S. Subramanyam, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Rajora, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Ms. Ritika Raj, Adv. Ms. Komal, Adv. Ms. Niharika Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Ajay Mishra, Adv. Mr. Vipin Gupta, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R

Pursuant to our order 18.10.2023 and the subsequent order dated 21.11.2023, extending the time, Mr. Ravindra Kumar Raizada and Mr. Vishwajit Singh, learned Senior Advocates appearing on behalf of the Greater NOIDA and Uttar Pradesh Awas Vikas Parishad, respectively, have stated that the said respondents have already inspected the site, and technically, they feel it appropriate that there should be a structural audit to be conducted by an expert agency, like Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi or any other institute of equal competence for that matter, and for the said purpose, they would require eight weeks' time.

Although, there is opposition by Ms. Meenaskhi Arora, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner(s) with respect to the time sought before us, but considering the nature of expert report, which is sought to be obtained, we deem it appropriate to grant eight weeks' time to the respondents.

It is ensured by the learned counsel for the aforesaid respondents that the respondents will immediately start the exercise of getting the structural audit, and they further assured the Court that they would submit the report by the next date of hearing.

We would also request the agency engaged by the respondents for the purpose of structural audit to make endevour to submit the report within time as fixed by this Court.

The matter may be listed on 05.03.2024.

(BABITA PANDEY) (RANJANA SHAILEY) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

10