Yojana Shriniwas Kulkarni vs. The State Of Maharashtra
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.46
COURT NO.4
SECTION IX
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 36767/2024
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-12-2023 in WP No. 2862/2023 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay)
YOJANA SHRINIWAS KULKARNI & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
(I.R. and IA No.183634/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.183633/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.183635/2024-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) AND IA No. 183634/2024 -CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING AND IA No. 183633/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
WITH Diary No(s). 3155/2024 (IX) (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS ON IA 169248/2024 AMD FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 169251/2024 IA No. 169248/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS AND IA No. 169251/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Diary No(s). 3189/2024 (IX) (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS ON IA 169324/2024 AND FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 169326/2024 IA No. 169324/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS AND IA No. 169326/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Diary No(s). 3234/2024 (IX) (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS ON IA 169607/2024 AND FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 169608/2024 IA No. 169607/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS AND IA No. 169608/2024 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date: 14-10-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
<table><tbody>The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The Metal The M hy Dr 16.56 E<sup>11</sup><br>Reas C Respondent(s) Mr. Prashant Shrikant Kenjale, AOR Mr. Siddharth S. Chapalgaonkar, Adv.Ms. Sneha Botwe, Adv.
Mr. Pai Amit, AOR
Mr. Birendra Saraf, Advocate General, Sr. Adv. Mr. Birendra Saraf, Advovate General, Sr. Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv. Ms. Preet S. Phanse, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Dubey, Adv.
Mr. Bhushan Mahendra Oza, AOR
Mr. Amber Deivedi, Adv.
Mr. Kuldeep Sharma, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Office report would reveal that some of the respondents are unserved.
The petitioner shall take appropriate steps to serve the unserved respondents within a period of three weeks.
It will be open to the respondents, who have entered appearance, to file counter affidavit, if any.
(DR. NAVEEN RAWAL) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) DY. REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)