Delhi Jal Board vs. Abhisht Kusum Gupta
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Registrar
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Listed On:
3 Jan 2024
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
179810/2022,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REGISTRAR COURT. 1 ITEM NO.21 SECTION XVII
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. APARNA AJITSARIA
Civil Appeal No(s). 8547-8548/2022
NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant( $s$ )
VERSUS
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
IA No. 19274/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING COUNTER AFFIDAVIT IA No. 176359/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 176361/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 176358/2022 - STAY APPLICATION)
WITH C.A. No. 8967-8968/2022 (XVII) $(FOR)$ FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 179810/2022 <pre>IA No. 179810/2022 - EX-PARTE STAY)</pre>
Date: 01-03-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.
For Appellant(s)
Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR Ms. Nivedita Nair, Adv. Ms. Surabhi Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Adv. Mr Rachit Mittal, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Singh, AOR
For Respondent(s)
| Signature vol verilled | |
|---|---|
| Digitally signed by<br>PRIYANKA MALIK<br>Date: 2024-03.02<br>11:16:54 IST<br>Reason: | Mr. Sunil J Mathews, Adv.<br>Ms. Jyoti Rani, Adv.<br>Mr. Rajeev Singh, AOR |
Mr. Pradeep Misra, AOR Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Adv. Mr. Suraj Singh, Adv. Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Adv. Mr. Rajinder Singh, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
C.A. No.8547-8548/2022
Service is complete on respondent nos. 1,2 and 5 to 9 but none has entered appearance.
Opportunity to respondent no.3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.
Respondent no.4 has already filed counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr Tahir Ashraf Siddiqui, Advocate-on-record submits that since earlier counsel has been designated as Senior Advocate, they have filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.4. Office to verify and update the records.
Respondent no.10 has filed counter affidavit alongwith an application for condonation of delay in filing counter counter affidavit. Same is allowed.
C.A. No. 8967-8968/2022
Respondent no. 1 has filed counter affidavit and an application for condonation of delay in filing counter affidavit. Same is allowed.
Contd….
Item no.21
Respondent no.6 has filed counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr Tahir Ashraf Siddiqui, Advocate-onrecord submits that since earlier counsel has been designated as Senior Advocate, they have filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.6. Office to verify and update the records.
Opportunity to respondent nos. 4 and 5 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.
As per office report, ld. Counsel for the petitioner has neither taken fresh steps nor filed fresh particulars in respect of respondent no.9 despite last opportunity having been granted. However, ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent no.9 has been served through the standing counsel, Mr S.N.Terdal. Office to verify and update the records.
Service is complete on the remaining respondents but none has entered appearance.
Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.