Bejai Singh vs. Financial Commisioner
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
9 Feb 2015
Order Text
SECTION IVB
Listed on 12.02.2016 Court No. R2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Item No. 37 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITIONS FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NOS. 31231 OF 2014 AND 5587 OF 2015
WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF
Ajit Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors. Respondent(s)
OFFICE REPORT
The matters above mentioned were listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 04.12.2015, when the following Order was passed:
"SLP(C) No.31231/2014
Ld.counsel for the respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit which is defective. Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks rectify the defects whatever have been found in the said affidavit.
SLP(C) No.5587/2015
Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 17.09.2015 of this Court in respect of the respondent Nos.79.
Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent Nos.14 to file the counter affidavit.
List the matter again on 12.02.2016."
SLP (C) No. 31231 of 2014
It is submitted that Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Advocate has on 30.09.2015 and 27.10.2015 filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 and Counter Affidavit on behalf of Respondent No. 1. Counter Affidavit is defective as proof of service on Mr. Ravindra Bana, Advocate has not been filed despite letter dated 17.11.2015.
It is further submitted that Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate has on 16.12.2015 filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 2 but No Objection Certificate from Mr. Ravindra Bana, Advocate has not been filed. Mr. Ravindra Bana, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 has failed to file Counter Affidavit within the time granted.
Service of show cause notice is complete on all the three respondents.
SLP (C) No. 5587 of 2015
It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh steps regarding service of Respondent Nos. 79 so far.
It is further submitted that Mr. R. C. Kaushik, Counsel for Respondent Nos. 14 has not filed Counter Affidavit on their behalf so far.
It is further submitted that Mr. Ravindra Bana, Advocate has filed affidavit with proof of service regarding respondent No. 6 without stamp.
It is further submitted that Dr. Monika Gusain, Counsel has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 5 but no Counter Affidavit has been filed so far.
It is further submitted that Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama & Memo of Appearance on behalf of petitioner but the same is found defective for the reason that he has not taken 'No Objection' from erstwhile Counsel. Hence, his name is not updated in the Computer data.
Service of show cause notice is incomplete.
The matters are listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report.
Dated this the 10th day of February, 2016.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Copy to: Ms. Usha Nandini V., Adv. Mr. Ravindra Bana, Adv. Mr. R. C. Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Adv.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order