Commander Realtor Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Jyoten Kandel vs. Pawan Bhatia& Ors.

Æ"ITEM NO.63 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30780/2015 ANANT RAJ LTD. ( FORMERLY ANANT RAJ INDUSTRIES LTD.)Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 31527/2015 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 35326/2015 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 32798/2015 (With (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11082/2016 Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 15/12/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Arun Monga, Adv. Mr. Tushar Bakshi,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Himanshu, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. -2- Item No.63 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.30780/2015 Despite last opportunity having been granted, counter affidavit has not been filed by respondent nos. 4 and 5, as such, further opportunity is declined. Opportunity to respondent nos. 7 to 9 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos. 1 to 3 within two weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued. None appears for respondent no.6 despite due service. SLP(C) No.31527/2015 Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 to 3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Respondent nos. 4 to 6 have not filed counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity is declined. Fresh steps for effecting service on respondent no.8 have not been taken despite last opportunity having been granted nor clarification in respect of respondent no.7 has been made in terms of previous order. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers alongwith appropriate detailed office report for further directions. -3- Item No.63 SLP(C) No. 35326/2015 None appears for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and 8 despite due service.

Respondent nos. 4 to 6 and 9 have not filed counter

affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity is declined. Clarification in respect of respondent no.7 has not been made in terms of previous order, as such, let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers alongwith appropriate detailed office report for further directions. SLP(C) No. 11082/2016 Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos. 1-3 & 6 within two weeks time as last opportunity. Notices thereafter be issued. Respondent no.5 is granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. Respondent nos. 4 and 7 are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. SLP(C) No. 32798/2015 Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 to 3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Respondent nos. 4 to 6 and 9 have not filed counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity is declined. None appears for respondent no.7 despite due service. -4- Item No.63 Fresh steps for effecting service on respondent no.8 have not been taken despite last opportunity having been granted. Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers alongwith appropriate detailed office report for

further directions. List again on 1.2.2017.

(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar