REGISTRAR COURT. 1

SECTION IVB

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 30780/2015

ANANT RAJ LTD. (FORMERLY ANANT RAJ INDUSTRIES LTD.) Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS

Respondent(s)

(with interim relief and office report)

WITH

SLP(C) No. $31527/2015$ (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned judgment and Interim Relief and Office Report)

$SLP(C)$ No. 35326/2015 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Office Report)

$SLP(C)$ No. 32798/2015 (With (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing $c/c$ of the impugned judgment and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents <pre>and Interim Relief and Office Report)</pre>

$SLP(C)$ No. 11082/2016 <pre>Interim Relief and Office Report)</pre>

Date : $15/12/2016$ This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr Arun Monga, Adv. Mr. Tushar Bakshi, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv.

Respondent(s)

Mr Himanshu, Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv. Ms Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

SLP(C) No.30780/2015

Despite last opportunity having been granted, counter affidavit has not been filed by respondent nos. 4 and 5, as such, further opportunity is declined.

Opportunity to respondent nos. 7 to 9 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos. 1 to 3 within two weeks time. Notices thereafter be issued.

None appears for respondent no.6 despite due service. SLP(C) No.31527/2015

Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 to 3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.

Respondent nos. 4 to 6 have not filed counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity is declined.

Fresh steps for effecting service on respondent no.8 have not been taken despite last opportunity having been granted nor clarification in respect of respondent no.7 has been made in terms of previous order.

Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers alongwith appropriate detailed office report for further directions.

Item No.63

SLP(C) No. 35326/2015

None appears for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and 8 despite due service.

Respondent nos. 4 to 6 and 9 have not filed counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity is declined.

Clarification in respect of respondent no.7 has not been made in terms of previous order, as such, let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers alongwith appropriate detailed office report for further directions.

SLP(C) No. 11082/2016

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos. 1-3 & 6 within two weeks time as last opportunity. Notices thereafter be issued.

Respondent no.5 is granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit.

Respondent nos. 4 and 7 are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit.

SLP(C) No. 32798/2015

Opportunity to respondent nos. 1 to 3 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.

Respondent nos. 4 to 6 and 9 have not filed counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity is declined.

None appears for respondent no.7 despite due service.

-3-

Item No.63

Fresh steps for effecting service on respondent no.8 have not been taken despite last opportunity having been granted.

Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers alongwith appropriate detailed office report for further directions.

List again on 1.2.2017.

(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar