Pallavi vs. The State Of Karnataka Chief Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Administrative Order
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
List After (Weeks) [1], List before court/bench
Listed On:
7 Nov 2019
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
37826/2018,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
M. G. GOPAL & ANR. (ONLY SLP(Crl) No. 2321 - / 2022 TO BE LISTED ) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 2321/2022 (II-C) SLP(Crl) No. 7239/2022 (II-C) ( IA No.99238/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.99239/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, AOR Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. Parikshit Angadi, Adv. Mr. Dhanesh Ieshdhan, Adv. Mr. Shubransh Pathi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, AOR Ms. Sakshi Banga, Adv. Ms. Rakhi Madiyal, Adv. Mr. Rajan Parmar, Adv. Mr. Prakash Ranjan Nayak, AOR Mr. C. B. Gururaj, Adv. Mr. Animesh Dubey, Adv. Mr. Joqv Scaria, AOR Mr. Rajesh Mahale, Adv. Mr. Amil J. Sharma, Adv.
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2157-2158/2021
REGISTRAR COURT. 2
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
VERSUS
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. S.P.S. LALER
Date: 18-08-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the art made the following
ORDER
SLP(Crl) No. 2321/2022
Four weeks time, as a last chance, is granted to respondent
ITEM NO.30
Petitioner(s)
Respondent $(s)$
SECTION II-C
no. 1 to file counter affidavit.
As per office report, service is not complete in respect of respondent no. 2. However, Mr. Amil J. Sharma, Ld. Advocate for Mr. Rajesh Mahale, AOR has appeared on behalf of respondent no. 2. He submits that he has filed vakalatnama yesterday evening and does not wish to file counter affidavit.
If vakalatnama is filed and is in order, matter be placed before Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
Otherwise list again on 19.09.2022.
S.P.S. LALER Registrar