The Assistant Commissioner (Ct)Ii vs. Bharti Airtel Ltd A. P. . Rep. By Its Manager Legal

\230 ITEM NO.62 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33099/2012 ASST.COMMR.(CT-II) A.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATI AIRTEL LTD. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment and office report ) WITH SLP(C) NO.33102/2012 SLP(C) NO.5879/2013 SLP(C) NO.5880/2013 SLP(C) NO.5244/2013 Date: 01/07/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr B Debojit, Adv. Mr. G.N.Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R.Chandrachud,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad ,Adv Mr Nikhil Parikshith, Adv. M/s Suresh A Shroff & Co. Mr Shankey Agrawal, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) NO.33099/2012 Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no.1 has been filed on record. The ld. Counsel has undertaken to serve copy on the other side. Respondent nos. 2 and 3 have failed to file counter affidavit within the time granted by the Court. However, -2- Item No.62 further necessary orders would be passed as and when connected matters would become ready. SLP(C) NO.33102/2012 Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no.1 has already come on record. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have failed to file counter affidavit within the time granted by the Court. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when other connected matters would become ready. SLP(C) NO.5879/2013 Notice be re issued to the sole respondent through the concerned District Court besides usual mode. SLP(C) NO.5880/2013 Sole respondent is reported to be duly served through post but none appeared nor any steps taken on his behalf. However, further necessary orders would be passed as and when other connected matters would become ready. SLP(C) NO.5244/2013 Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.1 for filing counter affidavit. Respondent No.2 is reported to be served through the standing counsel but none appeared nor any steps taken on his behalf. List again on 6.8.2013. | | |(M.A.SAYEED) | | | |REGISTRAR |

hj