The Assistant Commissioner (Ct)Ii vs. Bharti Airtel Ltd A. P. . Rep. By Its Manager Legal

ITEM NO.36 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).33099/2012 ASST.COMMR.(CT-II) A.P.& ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHARATI AIRTEL LTD. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment and office report) with SLP(C) Nos.33102 and 40117/2012 (with office report) Date: 15/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Debojit, Adv. Mr. G.N.Reddy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R.Chandrachud,Adv. Ms. Deepali Surana, Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad ,Adv Mr. Shankey Agrawal, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.33099/2012 Despite final chance granted on the last date, respondent Nos.1 to 3 have failed to file counter affidavit within the time granted by the Court. Request for further grant of time is rejected. Item No.36 -2-

SLP(C) No.33102/2012

Ð

The learned Advocate, Mr. Praveen Kumar has filed vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.1 but the office report indicates that 'No Objection' from the erstwhile Advocate, Mr. R. Chandrachud has not been obtained. Needful be done by the next date. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 have failed to file counter affidavit within the time granted by the Court. SLP(C) No.40117/2012

Sole respondent is reported to be duly and properly served through post but none appeared nor any steps have been taken on his behalf. Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. List again on 1.7.2013.

| | | (M.A. SAYEED) | | | |REGISTRAR | | | | | rd