The Assistant Commissioner (Ct)Ii vs. Bharti Airtel Ltd A. P. . Rep. By Its Manager Legal

ð+ITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal No(s). 8774/2012 STATE OF A.P.TR.STATE REP. Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S RAICHOTI VISWANATHAM S. SETTY Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 33099/2012 SLP(C) No. 33102/2012 SLP(C) No. 5244/2013 SLP(C) No. 39487/2013 SLP(C) No. 39497/2013 SLP(C) No. 2939/2014 SLP(C) No. 2940/2014 SLP(C) No. 2943/2014 SLP(C) No. 2945/2014 SLP(C) No. 2949/2014 SLP(C) No. 2950/2014 SLP(C) No. 25462/2015 SLP(C) No. 25468/2015 SLP(C) No. 26814/2015 (With Office Report) Date : 26/09/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar,Adv. M/s. Venkat Palwai Law Associates,Adv. Mr.Gireesh Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. R. Chandrachud,Adv. ⬠¦ ......2 ITEM NO.9 -2- AC 8774/2012 Mr.Ishan Gaur,Adv. Mr. S. S. Shroff,Adv. Mr.Udit Jain,Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar,Adv. Mr.Ambarish Pandey,Adv. Mr. Punit Dutt Tyagi,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Ms.Neha Agarwal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No.8774/2012 Ld.counsel for the appellant shall file the deficit court fee within four weeks as last chance whereafter no further extension shall be given. List again on 08.11.2016. SLP(C) Nos.33099, 33102/2012 & 5244/2013 The office report is that these matters have already been directed to be listed before the Hon'ble Court. Hence, no further order is required to be passed in them. SLP(C) No. 39487/2013 The respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. The respondent Nos.2 & 3 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules after expiry of four weeks. SLP(C) No. 39497/2013 Four weeks time as last chance is given to the respondent Nos.1 & 2 to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.3, but no one has entered appearance

on his behalf. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules after expiry of four weeks. ⬠¦......3

ITEM NO.9 -3- AC 8774/2012 SLP(C) No. 2939,2949/2014 The served respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.2 & 3, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. SLP(C) No. 26814/2015 The sole respondent has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. SLP(C) Nos.2940, 2943 & 2945/2014 The served respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.3, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of the respondent No.2 within four weeks. SLP(C) No. 2950/2014 The served respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps in respect of the respondent No.1 within four weeks. SLP(C) No. 25468/2015 The respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.3, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent No.2. ⬠¦.......4 ITEM NO.9 -4- AC 8774/2012

SLP(C) No. 25462/2015 The respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent No.2 and also to file an I.A. for amendment of cause title along with certificate of incorporation as the name of respondent No.1 has been changed. List the matters again on 08.11.2016.

(M V RAMESH) Registrar

SB