IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION

REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 3476 OF 2018

$\underline{\text{IN}}$

SLP (C) NO. 22747 OF 2018

Y. NARAYANA RAJU

<pre>.. Petitioner(s)</pre>

Versus

SARASWATHULA KAMESWARAMMA (D) REP. BY HER GPA HOLDER SARASWATHULA VENKATA SURYA SEETHARAMA SASTRY

$\ldots$ Respondent(s)

ORDER

Delay condoned.

Having carefully gone through the review petition, the order under challenge and the papers annexed therewith, we are satisfied that there is no error apparent on the face of the record, warranting reconsideration of the order <pre>impugned.</pre>

The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

$\cdots\cdots\cdots\cdots\cdots\cdots\cdots\cdots\cdots\cdots\cdots\cdots\cdots$ (ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (INDU MALHOTRA)

🗱 Delhi, Dated: November 20, 2018. S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

R.P.(C) No. 3476/2018 in SLP(C) No. 22747/2018

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-08-2018 in SLP(C) No. No. 22747/2018 passed by the Supreme Court Of India)

Y. NARAYANA RAJU Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SARAAWATHULA KAMESWARAMMA(D) REP. BY HER GPA HOLDER SARASWATHULA VENKARA SURYA SEETHARAMA SASTRY Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.159189/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REVIEW PETITION )

Date : 20-11-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA

By Circulation

UPON perusing papers the Court made the following O R D E R

Delay condoned.

The review petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order.

(MANAV SHARMA) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Signed order is placed on the file.)