A. Srilatha vs. K. Chandra Prakash Rao
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Hrishikesh Roy, Hon'ble Dipankar Datta
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
13 Dec 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN COURT NO.7
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 21434/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-10-2022 in SA No. 878/2017 passed by the High Court For The State of Telangana at Hyderabad)
A. SRILATHA
Petitioner(s)
Respondent $(s)$
VERSUS
K. CHANDRA PRAKASH RAO & ORS.
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.183484/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.183481/2022-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date: 13-12-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.
- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. V. Giri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajgal Ravi Babu, Adv. Mrs. Prabha Swami, AOR Mr. Nikhil Swami, Adv. Ms. Divva Swami, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. T. V. Ratnam, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard Mr. V. Giri, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. T.V. Ratnam, learned counsel appearing on Caveat for the contesting respondent No. 1.
Having considered the circumstances in this matter, we are not Inductive the second state of the second resistance of the second resistance of the second resistance of the second resistance of the second resistance of the second resistance of the second resistance of the second res igitally signed by<br>RJUN BIS $\mathbb{R}$ <br> $\mathbb{R}$ 2022 12.13 18:02:19 same is dismissed.
The learned senior counsel has pointed out a Civil Suit i.e.
$\mathbf{1}$
OS 758 of 2017 on the file of III Addl Dist. Judge, Ranga Reddy District is filed and is pending amongst the contesting parties on the subject matter of the property in dispute, it is therefore appropriate to say even while dismissing the petition that the observation made in the impugned judgment is to be understood as pertaining to the injunction matter only.
This petition stands dismissed with the above order.
All pending applications stand disposed of.
(GAGANDEEP SINGH CHADHA) (MONIKA DEY) (SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT) (BRANCH OFFICER)