The Commissioner Bangalore Development Authrotiy vs. Sridhar S
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
REGISTRAR COURT. 2 ITEM NO.61
SECTION IV-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. VIVEK SAXENA
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10058/2023 THE COMMISSIONER & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
R. ADHIKESAVULU NAIDU & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
(FOR ADMISSION)
Date: 07-08-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, AOR Ms. Uditha Chakravarthy, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0$ R D F R
Despite due service on respondent Nos.2 to 4, there is no appearance.
Four weeks time, is granted to respondent No.11, to file counter affidavit.
Four weeks time, is granted to the petitioner, for furnishing fresh particulars and to take fresh steps in respect of respondent Nos. 1.5 to 8 and 10 and also to file application for substitution to bring n record Lrs. of deceased respondent No. 9.
List again on 26.9.2023.
VIVEK SAXENA Registrar