SECTION IVB

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 11183/2012

KIRPAL SINGH & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

Respondent(s)

WITH SLP(C) No. $12547/2012$ Office Report)

$SLP(C)$ No. 17603/2012 Office Report)

$SLP(C)$ No. 23587/2012 <pre>Interim Relief)</pre>

$SLP(C)$ No. 1285/2013 <pre>Interim Relief and Office Report)</pre>

SLP(C) No. 11078/2013 Office Report)

$SLP(C)$ No. 30011/2013 <pre>Interim Relief)</pre>

$SLP(C)$ No. 33890/2014

$SLP(C)$ No. 20672/2015 <pre>Interim Relief and Office Report)</pre>

SLP(C) No. $12974-12975/2014$ <pre>Interim Relief and Office Report)</pre>

Date : $29/04/2016$ This petition was called on for hearing today.

$\sqrt{$ Petitioner(s)

Mr. Shekhar Kumar, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, Adv. Mr Shrey Kapoor, Adv. Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, Adv.

Ms. S. Janani,Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. Mr Dinesh Kothari, Adv. Mr. Sajith. P,Adv. Ms Disha Singh, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh,Adv. Ms. K. Enatoli Sema,Adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv. Ms Shumaila Altaf, Adv. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr K.K.Mahalik, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Mr Sitesh Narayan Singh, Adv. M/s Aura & Co.,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. Ms. Manju Jetley,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) No. 12974-12975/2014

Office report not received.

SLP(C) NO.33890/2014

Deleted.

SLP(C) NO.11183/2012

Respondent No.1 has already filed counter affidavit.

Respondent no.2 is granted two weeks time as lat opportunity for filing counter affidavit.

SLP against respondent no.3 stands abated in terms of Hon'ble Judge in Chambers order dt.18.1.2016.

Respondent no.4 has been deleted from the array of parties.

IA Nos. 3 and 4 are pending for being listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.

Item No.14

SLP(C) NO.1285/2013

Despite last opportunity granted, respondent nos. 1 to 3 have not filed counter affidavit. Further opportunity is declined.

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to furnish fresh particulars of respondent 25 within two weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued.

Despite last opportunity granted, application for substitution of legal representatives of deceased respondent nos. 8 and 21 has not been filed nor fresh steps for service of respondent nos. 27 and 32 have been taken.

Service on remaining respondents is complete but none has entered appearance.

Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.

SLP(C) NO.11078/2013

Respondent no.1 has already filed counter affidavit.

Await service of respondent no.2.

Respondent no.3 is granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit.

SLP(C) NO.30011/2013

Respondent no.2 is granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit.

Spare copies for service of respondent no.1 have not been filed despite last opportunity granted.

Item No.14

Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.

SLP(C) NO.12547/2012

Respondent nos. 1 to 9 have already filed counter affidavit.

Respondent nos. 11 to 31 have already been deleted from the array of parties vide Hon'ble Judge in Chambers order dt.5.2.2013.

Fresh steps to effect service on respondent No.10 have not been taken despite last opportunity granted.

Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.

SLP(C) NO.23587/2012

Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have filed counter affidavit.

None appears on behalf of respondent no.3 despite due service.

Fresh steps to effect service on respondent No.4 have not been taken despite last opportunity granted.

Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.

SLP(C) NO.17603/2012

Respondent nos. 1 to 11 have already filed counter affidavit.

Defects in the application for deletion of respondent no.12 be cured within two weeks time.

SLP(C) NO.20672/2015

Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have already filed counter affidavit.

Despite last opportunity granted, fresh steps to effect service on respondent No.3 have not been taken.

Let the matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.

(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar