Income Tax Officer Tds Ward Karnal Income Tax Officer vs. Guklab Singh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Listed on: 07122016 Court No.: R1 Item No. : 17
SECTION III-A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NOS. 25873 AND 31941 OF 2013
INCOME TAX OFFICER, KARNAL & ORS. ...PETITIONERS
VERSUS
ANIL KUMAR & ORS ...RESPONDENTS
OFFICE REPORT
The matters above-mentioned were listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 5th October, 2016, when the following order was passed:-
"SLP(C) NO.25873/2013
None appears for respondent Nos.6,7,10 and 11, despite due service.
Four weeks' time, as last opportunity, is granted to respondent Nos. 1 to 3, 8 and 9 for filing counter affidavit.
Last opportunity is granted to the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner for filing application for substitution of the legal representatives of the deceased respondent No. 4, if so advised and otherwise permissible within two weeks' time. Registry to process thereafter under rules.
Registry to submit the status of the counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No. 5 in the next office report.
SLP(C) NO. 31941/13
Fresh steps to be taken for service of all the respondents within two weeks' time, as last opportunity. Notice thereafter be issued.
SLP(C) NO. 19887/2014
None appears for respondent No. 2, despite due service.
Respondent No. 1 has already filed the counter affidavit. Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court alongwith the tagged matters, as and when ready. List again on 7.12.2016."
It is submitted that Mr. Shreepal Singh, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3, 8 and 9 and Respondent No. 3 and Respondent No. 5 are same but he has not filed counter affidavit till date pursuant to the order quoted above.
It is also submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not filed an Application for substitution of legal representative of deceased respondent no. 4 (Mr. Ajmer Singh S/o Shri Jagram) till date.
SLP (C) 31941 OF 2013
It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not taken any fresh steps for effecting service on all the 10 respondents. Therefore notice could not be issued.
Service is not complete on all the Respondents.
The matters above-mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report.
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2016
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
COPY TO: Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocate.
Mr. Shreepal Singh, Advocate.