Vbera Technologies Pvt. Ltd vs. Board Of Directors Of Bank Of Baroda
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Mention Memo
Before:
Hon'ble Bela M. Trivedi, Hon'ble Satish Chandra Sharma
Stage:
FRESHLY / ADJOURNED MATTERS
Remarks:
List After (Weeks) [8]
Listed On:
12 Aug 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
COURT NO.16
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).19696-19697/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-07-2023 in WPL No.9116/2023 and IA(L) No.12380/2023 passed by the High <pre>Court of Judicature at Bombay)</pre>
LATIF YUSUF MANIKKOTH
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE BANK OF BARODA & ORS.Respondent(s)
(IA No. 198001/2023 - AMENDMENT OF APPEAL / PETITION / I.A. AND IA No. 180106/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 19715-19716/2023 (IX)
(IA No.180183/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.180185/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date: 08-12-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI HON'RIE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Mathews J. Nedumpara, Adv. |
|---|---|
| Ms. Maria Nedumpara, Adv. | |
| Ms. Hemali Kurne, Adv. | |
| Ms. Usha Nandini V., AOR | |
| Ms. Rohini Amin, Adv. | |
| Mr. Shameem Fayiz, Adv. | |
| Mr. Bhupinder Singh Munday, Adv. | |
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Avinash Kr. Lakhanpal, AOR |
| Mr. Sk Singhi, Adv. | |
| Mr. Piyush Lakhanpal, Adv. | |
| Mr. Ankur Singhi, Adv. | |
| Mr. Akshay Singhi, Adv. | |
| Ms. Akshaya Puthran, Adv. | |
| Ms. Sindhuja Rastogi, Adv. | |
| Signature Not Verified<br>Digitally signed by<br>RAVI AROR<br>Date: 2023-12.09 | Ms. Anika Bajpai, Adv. |
| Ms. Sneha Singh, Adv. | |
| Ms. Praveena Gautam, AOR |
Mr. Pawan Shukla, Adv. Ms. Akanksha Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Raja Ram, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
1. Mr. Mathews J. Nedumpara, learned counsel for the petitioner was heard for sometime and the Court rose for the lunch break conveying that the hearing will continue. However, after the lunch break, he is not present in the Court, and Ms. Hemali Kurne, learned counsel appearing through virtual mode mentions that Mr. Nedumpara had to leave the Court to catch his flight and hence accommodation is sought.
2. In view of above request, list after eight weeks.
3. It is clarified that the respondents-authorities shall be at liberty to proceed further with the pending proceedings in accordance with law.
(RAVI ARORA) (MAMTA RAWAT)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)