Acharya N G Ranga Agricultral University vs. D V Shiva Rao
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Mention Memo
Before:
Hon'ble A.S. Bopanna, Hon'ble S. Ravindra Bhat
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Delay Condoned and matter dismissed(including all pending IAs)
Listed On:
28 Nov 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
1/2014,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.20827-20829/2012
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25-11-2011 in WA No. 10/2003 WA No. 559/2003 WA No. 1141/2003 passed by the High Court of A.P. at Hyderabad)
ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRIC.UNIVERSITY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
R.BENER RAJ & ORS.ETC. Respondent(s)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 20830-20831/2012 (XII-A)
SLP(C) No. 34681/2014 (XII-A)
(IA No. 1/2014 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
Date : 28-11-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
| For Petitioner(s) | Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR<br>Mr. Hrithil Manchanda, Adv. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Tathagat Harshvardhan, Adv.<br>Mr. Aditya Singh, AOR<br>Mr. Shubham Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Vishnu Shankar Jain, AOR |
| Mr. Mahfooz A. Nazki, AOR<br>Mr. Polanki Gowtham, Adv.<br>Mr. Shaik Mohamad Haneef, Adv.<br>Mr. T. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Adv.<br>Ms. Rajeswari Mukherjee, Adv.<br>Mr. K.V.Girish Chowdary, Adv.<br>Ms. Niti Richhariya, Adv. | |
| Mr. Byrapaneni Suyodhan, Adv.<br>Mr. Kumar Shashank,Adv. |
1
SLP(C) Nos.20827-20829/2012 & connected matters
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner University, learned counsel for the respondents and we have perused the order impugned in the petition.
Delay condoned.
Though contentions on merits have been urged, we notice that the respondents herein who were the beneficiaries of the order passed by the High Court, have all retired from the service and such if the benefit as ordered is given to them in monetary terms, it would not affect the service conditions of the persons who are in service and are promoted. In that view without expressing any opinion on the merits of the contentions urged, the Special Leave Petitions are dismissed in the facts and circumstances involved in this case.
However, the questions raised in these petitions are kept open to be urged in an appropriate proceedings, if the same arise for consideration therein.
Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of.
(RAJNI MUKHI) (DIPTI KHURANA) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
2