Acharya N G Ranga Agricultral University vs. D V Shiva Rao

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble A.S. Bopanna
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:4 Mar 2014
CNR:SCIN010359542014

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

p

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SANJIV JAIN

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).20827-20829/2012

ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRIC.UNIVERSITY Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

R.BENER RAJ & ORS.ETC. Respondent(s)

(With office report )

WITH SLP(C) NO. 20830-20831 of 2012 (With office report)

Date: 04/03/2014 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mrs.D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Ms Filza Moonis, Adv. Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. Mohit Kumar Shah, Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) NO.20827/2012

The ld. Counsel, Ms Filza Moonis appearing on behalf of Mr G Ramakrishna Prasad, Advocate-on-record submits that vakalatnama has been filed for the respondent Nos. 6,7,8 and 10 and not in respect of respondent No.9. She seeks four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Time as prayed for is granted.

The ld. Counsel for the petitioner to furnish the fresh and complete address of respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to 5 within two weeks and on compliance notices be issued forthwith through the concerned District Court in addition to postal means.

-2-

Item No.29 SLP(C) NO.20828/2012

Respondent Nos. 2,3,5 and 7 to 10 have been served but none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf.

Fresh steps be taken for service of notice on respondent No.4 through the concerned District Court in addition to postal service.

Respondent No.6 is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit.

Office report indicates that respondent No.1 has filed a letter stating therein that he is an old person of 81 years and suffering from Diabetes. He has requested for personal appearance and also submitted a detailed counter affidavit containing 50 pages. SLP(C) NO.20829/2012

Fresh steps be taken for service of notice on respondent Nos. 3 to 7 and 9 through the concerned district Court in addition to postal service. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have been served but none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf.

Respondent No.8 is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit.

SLP(C) NO.20830/2012

Respondent Nos. 1,2,3,5 and 8 to 10 have been served but none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf.

Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit.

-3- Item No.29 Fresh steps be taken for service of notice on respondent No.4 through the concerned District Court in addition to postal service. SLP(C) NO.20831/2012 Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, 8 and 9 are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit, if any. Respondent Nos. 4,5,7 and 10 to 12 have been served but none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Fresh steps be taken for service of notice on respondent No.6 through the concerned District Court in addition to postal service. List again on 5.5.2014.

(SANJIV JAIN)<br>
REGISTRAR<br>

hj

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(43) - 28 Nov 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(42) - 24 Feb 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(41) - 20 Jan 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(40) - 18 Nov 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(39) - 20 Feb 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(38) - 22 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(37) - 24 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(36) - 14 Sept 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(33) - 22 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(34) - 22 Aug 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(35) - 22 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(30) - 5 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(31) - 5 May 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(32) - 5 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(27) - 6 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 6 Apr 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(29) - 6 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 22 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 22 Jan 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 22 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 30 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 30 Oct 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 30 Oct 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(23) - 30 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 12 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 12 Aug 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 12 Aug 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 12 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 24 Apr 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 24 Apr 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 8 Dec 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(12) - 8 Dec 2014

Office Report

Click to view

Order(13) - 8 Dec 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 7 Nov 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 7 Nov 2014

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 7 Nov 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 8 Aug 2014

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 8 Aug 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 5 May 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 4 Mar 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(3) - 24 Jul 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 12 Oct 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 12 Jul 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view