Kalepu Raja Rajeswari vs. Challa Sundeep Babu
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
After Week/Month/Vacation
Before:
Hon'ble Hrishikesh Roy, Hon'ble Prashant Kumar Mishra
Stage:
TRANSFER PETITIONS
Remarks:
Case Allowed
Listed On:
25 Jan 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO.2426/2023
KALEPU RAJA RAJESWARI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
CHALLA SUNDEEP BABU Respondent(s)
O R D E R
Heard Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner (Wife). Also heard Mr. Rana Sandeep, learned counsel appearing for the respondent (husband).
2. The counsel for the respondent makes various contention to oppose the transfer plea by citing that the petitioner is a self-employed person and she has sibling who can also assist in looking after her ailing mother.
3. The petitioner's counsel however points out that a criminal case is filed before the P.S. Women Ramamurthy, Rajamahendravram against the respondent. Besides, a petition for Restitution of Conjugal rights has also been filed by the petitioner against the respondent and proceedings are pending before the Rajamahendravram Court.
4. Having regard to the circumstances in this case, we deem it appropriate to order transfer of the Family Court Original Petition No.489/2022 titled as "Challa Sundeep Babu vs. Kalepu Raja Rajeswari", pending before the court of Family Court, Secunderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana to court of competent Digitally signed by Jayant Kumar Arora Date: 2024.02.01 17:32:44 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
jurisdiction in the East Godavari district, Andhra Pradesh. It is ordered accordingly.
5. The Family Court, Secunderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana shall send the case records to the transferee Court without any delay.
6. After transfer of the case papers, the transferee Court is directed to make endeavour either for amicable settlement or for early decision in the matter without unnecessary adjournments.
7. If the respondent seeks participation through video conferencing, the same should be considered as per the orders of the transfree court.
8. The Transfer Petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand closed.
.......................J. [ HRISHIKESH ROY ]
........................J. [PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA ]
NEW DELHI; JANUARY 25, 2024
| ITEM NO.1 | COURT NO.6 | SECTION XII-A | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S U P R E M E | C O U R T<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | O F | I N D I A | |||
| Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) | No(s). | 2426/2023 | ||||
| KALEPU RAJA RAJESWARI | Petitioner(s) | |||||
| VERSUS | ||||||
| CHALLA SUNDEEP BABU | Respondent(s) | |||||
| (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.188683/2023-STAY APPLICATION and IA<br>No.188687/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ) | ||||||
| Date : 25-01-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. | ||||||
| CORAM :<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA | ||||||
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Md. Naushad Alam, AOR<br>Ms. Anum Hussain, Adv.<br>Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. | |||||
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Rana Sandeep, Adv.<br>Mr. Shashibhushan P. Adgaonkar, AOR | |||||
| UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following | O R D E R |
The Transfer Petition is allowed in terms of the signed order.
Pending application(s), if any, stand closed.
(DEEPAK JOSHI) (KAMLESH RAWAT) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Signed Order is placed on the File)