The Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited vs. G. N. Mani Ravinder

ITEM NO.47 REGISTRAR COURT SECTION XII-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24406- 24407/2023

THE BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

G.N. MANI RAVINDER & ORS. Respondent(s)

Date : 21-04-2025 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) :

RUPAM DHAMIJA

Mr. Piyush Sharma, AOR Mr. Anuj Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Aditya Dikshit, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application seeking deletion of the name of respondent No.2(expired), but the same is defective. As sought, a week's time is granted to cure the defects.

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed proof of dasti service with regard to service on respondent No.3 but the same is defective. Four weeks' time is granted to cure the defects. Digitally signed by Signature Not Verified

Opportunity to file counter affidavit by respondent No.5 has already been declined. Date: 2025.04.22 18:10:36 IST Reason:

contd….

Service is complete on respondent Nos.7 and 9.

As per office report, Ld. counsel who entered appearance for respondent Nos.7 and 9 on the last date of hearing, has not filed any vakalatnama or counter affidavit yet. Today, it has been submitted by Ld.Advocate, Mr. G. Arudhra Rao, appearing on behalf of Mr.Aniruddha Purushotham, Advocate-on-record that vakalatnama and counter affidavit would be filed within a period of one week. Let the same be done, as a last opportunity.

Service is complete on the remaining respondents, but none has entered appearance.

List again on 17.07.2025.

SUJATA SINGH rd Registrar