Food Safety And Standars Authority Of India vs. Jaya Products Through Its Partner

\224'ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.2 SECTION X SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.511 OF 2004 INDORE CONSUMER FORUM (REGD.) & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T., stay and office report) Date: 01/02/2008 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vivek Sharma,Adv. Ms. Nanita Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. A. Sharan,ASG. Mr. Samir Ali Khan,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. For Punjab: Ms. Jayshree Anand,AAG.,Pb. Mr. K.K. Mahalik,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh,Adv. Mr. Arun K. Sinha,Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Bihar: Mr. Gopal Singh,Adv. Mr. Anant Prakash,Adv. For Tripura: Mr. Gopal Singh,Adv. For Gujarat: Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. Ms. Pinky Behera,Adv. Ms. Jesal,Adv. Ms. Shivangi,Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Singh,Adv. ...2/- -2- Ms. Kamini Jaiswal,Adv. Mr. Dhruv Menta,Adv. Mr. Harshvardhan Jha,Adv. Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora,Adv. Mr. Gulshan Sharma,Adv. for M/s. K.L. Mehta & Co.,Advs. For Mizoram: Mr. K.N. Madhusoodhanan,Adv. Mr. R. Sathish,Adv. For West Bengal: Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma,Adv.

Ms. Neelam Sharma,Adv. Mr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. M.T. George,Adv. For Sikkim: Mr. A. Mariarputham,Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur,Adv. for M/s. Arputham,Aruna & Co.,Adv. Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee,Adv. For Tamil Nadu and Mr. V.G. Pragasam,Adv. Pudhucherry: Mr. S. Joseph Aristotle,Ad.v Mr. Prabu Ramasubramanian,Adv. For Himachal Pradesh: Mr. Naresh K. Sharma,Adv. for Mr. J.S. Attri,Adv. For Madhya Pradesh: Mr. M.P. Singh,Adv. Mr. B.S. Banthia,Adv. For Manipur: Mr. Khwairakpam Nobin Singh,Adv. Mr. David Rao,Adv. Mr. Tarun Jamwal,Adv. Mr. S. Biswajit Meitei,Adv. Mr. Vijay Prakash,Adv. Mr. Radha Shyam Jena,Adv. For Arunachal Pradesh: Mr. Anil Shrivastav,Adv. Mr. Ritu Raj,Adv. For Karnataka: Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde,Adv. Mr. Vikrant Yadav,Adv. Mr. Amit K. Chawla,Adv. For Respondent No.8: Mr. Ajay Pal,Adv. Mr. Rohit Walecha,Adv. Mr. Gagandeep Sharma,Adv. Mr. D. Mahesh Babu,Adv. ...3/- -3- For Uttar Pradesh: Ms. Niranjana Singh,Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha,Adv. Mr. Raj Singh Rana,Adv. M/s. Corporate Law Group,Advs. Ms. Suparna Srivastava,Adv. Ms. Nidhi Minocha,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Srivastava,Adv. Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia,Adv. Mr. R.F. Nariman,Sr.Adv. Mr. Sumit Goel,Adv. for M/s. Parekh And Co.,Advs. For Rajasthan: Mr. Manish Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary,Adv. Mr. Ramesh P. Bhatt,Sr.Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Dattatray Vyas,Adv. Ms. Indu Malhotra,Sr.Adv. Ms. Shashi M. Kapila,Adv. Mr. Nalin Talwar,Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER

Six weeks' time is allowed to the States of Andhra Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Bihar, Meghalaya, Nagaland, West Bengal, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Kerala and Union Territories of Andaman and Nicobar, Pudhucherry and Daman and Diu to file an affidavit.

Within the same time, response may be filed on behalf of the private respondents.

Place the petition thereafter.

[ Alka Dudeja ] [ Om Prakash ] Court Master Court Master