Supreme Court Bar Clerks Association Hony. Secretary Mr. R. Purushothaman vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Law And Justice Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
14 Nov 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.36 1
REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION PIL(W)
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 959/2014
Mr. Anip Sachthey,Adv.
SUPREME COURT BAR CLERKS ASSOCIATION Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Respondent(s)
Date : 26/10/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Ms. Usha Nandini. V,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Panshul Chandra,Adv. Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad,Adv. Mr. Sapam Biswajit Meitei,Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. R.S. Nagar,Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv.
Mr. Udit Arora,Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv.
Mr. Atul Jha,Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha,Adv.
Mr. A. Deb Kumar,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv.
Mr. Shreyas Jain,Adv. Mr. Gopal Singh,Adv.
Mr. Guntur Prabhakar,Adv.
Mr. Jayant Patel,Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,Adv. Mr. Pulkit Prakash,Adv. Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran,Adv. Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee,Adv. Ms. Malvika Trivedi,Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra,Adv. Mr. Rudreshwar Singh,Adv. Mr. Samir Ali Khan,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen,Adv. Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra,Adv. Mr. Mohd. Waquas,Adv. Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. V. G. Pragasam,Adv. Mr. V. N. Raghupathy,Adv. Mr. V. Shyamohan,Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur,Adv. M/s Arputham Aruna & Co.,Adv. Ms/Mr. Barnali Das,Adv. M/s Corporate Law Group,Adv. Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran,Adv. Ms. G. Indira,Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. Mr. Suryanaryana Singh,Adv. Ms. Pragati Neekhra,Adv. Ms. Rachana Srivastava,Adv. Mr. Nikilesh Ramachandran,Adv. Mr. Vijai Kumar,Adv. Mrs. K. Enatoli Sema,Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Visen,Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Jain,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
The Ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos.1,6,15,16,18,21,25,29 and 33 have already filed the counter affidavit. The Ld. Counsel for the other respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
(M V RAMESH) Registrar
MG