Union Of India vs. Ind Swift Ltd
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.61 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MA 600/2018 in C.A. in No(s). 23405-23472/2017
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
M/S BIOLOGICAL E LTD. AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Respondent(s)
IA 133675/2018 – CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION
WITH MA 1729/2018 in T.C.(C) No. 30/2017 (XVI-A) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.55843/2018-MODIFICATION)
MA 2466/2018 in C.A. Nos. 22982-23404/2017 (XIV) (FOR MODIFICATION ON IA 132849/2018)
MA 2470/2018 in C.A. Nos. 22982-23404/2017 (XIV) (FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 134250/2018)
Date : 17-09-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA
| For Petitioner | Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG |
|---|---|
| Mr. Ajit Kr. Sinha, Sr. Adv. | |
| Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. | |
| Mr. Sanjay K. Pathak, Adv. | |
| Mr. Rishi Kant Singh, Adv. | |
| Ms. Saudamini Sharma, Adv. | |
| Ms. Kriti, Adv. | |
| Ms. Snidha, Adv. | |
| Mr. G.S. Makker, AOR | |
| For Applicant(s)/ | Mr. Shyam Diwan, Sr. Adv. |
| Respondent(s) | Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Adv. |
| Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi, Adv. | |
| Mr. Arvined Ray, Adv. | |
| For M/s. Khaitan & Co., AOR | |
| Mr. Basava Prabhu S. Pati, Sr. Adv. | |
| Mr. Darpan K.M., Adv. | |
| Mr. Hetu Arora Sethi, AOR | |
Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Adv. Mr. R.N. Karanjawala, Adv. Mr. Samarjit Pattnaik, Adv. Mr. Arjun Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Puneet Relhan, Adv. Mr. A.S. Aman, Adv. Mr. Aviral Kapoor, Adv. Mrs. Manik Karanjawala, Adv. For M/s. Karanjawala & Co., AOR Mr. Ashish Prasad, Adv. Ms. Mukta Dutta, Adv. Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Avinash Tripathi, Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR Mr. Sachin Gupta, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Issue notice, returnable within three weeks.
Learned counsel for the parties are permitted to file Counter Affidavit within two weeks and Rejoinder Affidavit within one week.
In the meanwhile, on the statement made by learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicants with regard to Fixed Dose Combinations pre-1988 will continue to be manufactured and sold subject to the final outcome of these proceedings.
Mrs. Pinky Anand, learned ASG appearing for the Union of India, on instructions, disputes this.
(R. NATARAJAN) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER