Talcer-Ii Transmission Co. Ltd vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
6 Nov 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SECTION XVII MATTER FOR : 19.02.2016 COURT NO. 7 ITEM NO. 6
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL No. 9291 OF 2015 with CIVIL APPEAL No. 13370 OF 2015
North Karanpura Transmission Co. Ltd. & Etc. ... Appellants VERSUS
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors. Etc...Respondents
OFFICE REPORT
The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 16.11.2015 when the court was pleased to pass the following order:
"We have heard M/s. P. Chidambaram and Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants in the matters. Issue notice, returnable after four weeks. However, in the meantime, no coercive steps should be taken against the appellants including in terms of the notice which has been issued by the concerned authorities."
CIVIL APPEAL No. 9291 OF 2015
It is submitted that notice was issued on 24.11.2015 to all the 45 respondents through registered A.D. Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Pradeep Mishra and Chandra Prakash, Advocates have entered appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 1 , 25, 32 to 36 and 3 respectively but have not filed counter affidavit. Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of respondent no. 7 and has also filed counter affidavit. (Copies are placed with paper books) Mr. Pramod Dayal, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of respondent no. 2 and has also filed reply in the matter. (Copies are circulated herewith) Duly signed A.D. Cards have been received back in respect of respondent nos. 19, 30 and 45 but no one has entered appearance on its behalf. Neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover have been received back in respect of respondent nos. 4 to 6, 8 to 18, 20 to 24, 26 to 29, 31 and 37 to
- Service is incomplete. Counsel for the appellant has on 18.11.2015 filed application for permission to file additional documents and the same is registered as I.A. No. 3 of 2015.(Copies are placed with paper books) Counsel for the appellant has on 17.02.2016 filed rejoinder to the reply filed by respondent no. 7. (Copies are circulated herewith)
CIVIL APPEAL No. 13370 OF 2015
It is submitted that notice was issued on 26.11.2015 to all the 21 respondents through registered A.D. Mr. Saurabh Mishra, M.T. George and V.G. Pragasam, Advocates have entered appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 1, 14 and 15 respectively but has not filed counter affidavit. Mr. Pramod Dayal, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of respondent no. 2 and has also filed reply in the matter .(Copies are circulated herewith) Duly signed A.D. Cards have been received back in respect of respondent nos. 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 19 and 21 but no one has entered appearance on its behalf. Neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover have been received back in respect of respondent nos. 3, 6, 8, 9, 13, 18 and 20. Service is incomplete.
The matters above-mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.
DATED THIS THE 18th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to : Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate Mr. Saurabh Mishra ,Advocate Mr. M.T. George, Advocate Mr. Pramod Dayal, Advocate Mr. V.G. Pragasam, Advocate Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate Mr. Chander Prakash, Advocate
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR