Anuradha Muthappa Rai vs. Rocky Muthappa Rai
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
After Week/Month/Vacation
Before:
Hon'ble Vikram Nath, Hon'ble Prasanna B. Varale
Stage:
FRESHLY / ADJOURNED MATTERS
Remarks:
Dismissed as withdrawn
Listed On:
14 Nov 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.35 COURT NO.6 SECTION IV-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).18027-18028/2024
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25-07-2024 in WP No. 15799/2024 25-07-2024 in WP No. 16806/2024 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru]
ANURADHA MUTHAPPA RAI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
ROCKY MUTHAPPA RAI & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION )
Date : 14-11-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE
For Petitioner(s) Mr. K S Harish, Adv. Mr. Venkatesh Arbatti, Adv. Mr. Adeel Ahmed, AOR Mr. Giridhar Gowda, Adv. Ms. Sana Parveen, Adv. Mr. M. A. Karthik, Adv. Mr. Maitreya Subramaniam, Adv. Mr. Pallak Bhagat, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Santosh Kumar B C, Adv. Mr. Mahendra Kumar, Adv. Ms. Pooja Sagar, Attorney General for India Mr. Dhawesh Pahuja, AOR
Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR
- Mr. Shreyas Ranjan, Adv.
- Mr. V Krishnamurthy, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Learned counsel for the parties state that the parties have already arrived at a settlement and the said settlement has been recognized by the Court and decree has already been passed on the basis of such settlement. As such, this petition does not require any consideration.
In view of the above and as the settlement has been arrived at between the parties, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(NEETU KHAJURIA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS (RANJANA SHAILEY) COURT MASTER