Union Of India Etc vs. Shubh Timb Steel Ltd

ú% ITEM NO.40 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).1796/2012 COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.& CUSTONS SURAT-I Petitioner(s) VERSUS SAHELI SYNTHETICS P.LTD. Respondent(s) (With office report) with SLP(C) Nos.16249,21402,24139,27752,37566,38588, 21273/2012 and 1103-1104,4224,7852, 5877,9796,11709,14097,17534,18902/2013 (with office report) Date: 27/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Krishna Prasad,Adv. Mr. B.V. Balram Das, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. S. Sasi Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Maneesh P. Sahay, Adv. Mr. Braj Kishore Mishra, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Vasav Anantharaman, Adv. Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Adv. Mr. Rajan Narain, Adv. Mr. Garvesh Kabra, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C)No.21402/2012 Notice be reissued to the sole respondent through the concerned District Court in addition to postal service. Item No.40 -2- SLP(C) No.24139/2012 Both the respondents are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Complete set of the pleadings has been received by the learned counsel. SLP(C) No.27752/2012 Both the respondents are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. SLP(C) No.37566/2012 Both the respondents are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. SLP(C) No.38588/2012 The matter is to be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary consideration on application for condoning the delay in filing the process fee. SLP(C) No.21273/2012 Both the respondents are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. The learned counsel for the petitioner to carry out the necessary name, as indicated in the office report in a week's time, failing which the matter to be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary orders/directions. Item No.40 -3- SLP(C) Nos.1103-1104/2013 Counter affidavit on behalf of the sole respondent has already come on record. Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. SLP(C) No.4224/2013 Sole respondent is reported to be duly and properly served through post but none appeared on his behalf. Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. SLP(C) No.7852/2013 Sole respondent is reported to be duly and properly served through post as well as through District Court but none appeared on their behalf. Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. SLP(C) No.5877/2013 Sole respondent is reported to be duly and properly served through post but none appeared on his behalf. Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. SLP(C No.9796/2013 Counter affidavit on behalf of the sole respondent is reported to have filed on record by the learned Advocate, Mr.B.K. Prasad but no vakalatnama seems to have been filed. Item No.40 -4- Omission be rectified in a week's time, failing which further necessary orders, as per rules, shall be passed. SLP(C) No.11709/2013 Notice be reissued to the sole respondent through the concerned District Court in addition to postal service. SLP(C) No.14097/2013 Sole respondent is reported to be duly and properly served but none appeared on his behalf. SLP(C) No.17534/2013 Notice be reissued to the sole respondent through the concerned District Court in addition to postal service. SLP(C) No.18902/2013 Sole respondent is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit on record. List again on 4.10.2013. | | | (M.A. SAYEED) | | | |REGISTRAR | | | | |

amendment in the cause title in respect of the change in the Company's

rd