Chhoti Bai (Wrongly Mentioned In Cause Title Of Impugned Order As Chhutti Bai ) vs. Bhikam Singh (Dead) By Lrs

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).1681-1682/2012 CHHOTI BAI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHIKAM SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,exemption from filing O.T.,exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and prayer for interim relief ) WITH SLP(C) NO. 36084 of 2011 (With office report) Date: 17/07/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr S.S.Khandya, Adv. Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr Abdul Karim Ansari, Adv. Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The ld. Advocate for the petitioner has pointed out that there are three standing counsels for the concerned State and nobody is ready to accept notice. Petitioner is permitted to confirm dasti service through the Resident Commissioner. If Resident Commissioner also refuses to accept notice, petitioner can serve notice by affixing at the office of the Resident Commissioner through the local Process Server. -2- Item No.65 There is change in status of respondent No.1 in SLP(C) no. 1681-

ITEM NO.65 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVA

82/2012 and respondent No.1 in SLP(C) No. 36084/2011. The ld. Advocate for the petitioner states that they have filed an application to join all the legal heirs of such respondents. The ld. Advocate, Mr Abdul Karim Ansari appearing on behalf of Mr Ravi Kumar Tomar, Advocate-on-record, appears for such legal heirs of such litigants in both SLPs.

Therefore, such application shall be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers at the earliest without waiting for other formalities regarding confirming service, since probably there is no objection to join legal heirs as such.

In both petitions, respondent No.9 being private party, petitioner has to take appropriate steps for such respondents in view of the fact that status of such respondent is also reported to be changed.

List again on 11.9.2012.

Petitioner can certainly confirm notices through the standing counsel also.

| | |(S.G.SHAH) | | | |REGISTRAR |

hj