Chhoti Bai (Wrongly Mentioned In Cause Title Of Impugned Order As Chhutti Bai ) vs. Bhikam Singh (Dead) By Lrs

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:7 May 2012
CNR:SCIN010352292011

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

22 Dec 2011

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

\224ITEM NO.50 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).1681- 1682/2012 CHHOTI BAI & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS BHIKAM SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP,exemption from filing O.T.,exemption from filing c/c of the impugned order and prayer for interim relief) WITH SLP(C) NO. 36084 of 2011 (With office report) Date: 07/05/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Abdul Karim Ansari, Adv. Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) Nos.1681-1682/2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner has to take appropriate steps to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.9 and to file an application for condonation of delay in application of substitution in respect of respondent No.1. Item No.50 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner has also to cure the defects in the vakalatnama in respect of respondent No.6. Issue fresh notice with dasti service upon the unserved respondents, which is permitted to be served through

the nearest Civil Court/Trial court, where private parties are concerned and through standing counsel, where state authorities are concerned, if process fee and spare copies are paid/filed before 15.5.2012, else list before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution.

If notices are issued, list again on 17.7.2012.

SLP(C) No.36084/2011

Petitioners have to disclose the outcome of dasti service upon the unserved respondents.

Served respondents may file counter affidavit.

List again on 17.7.2012.

(S.G. SHAH) REGISTRAR

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(12) - 8 Mar 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 6 Feb 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 6 Dec 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 9 May 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 21 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 21 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 21 Mar 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 11 Sept 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 17 Jul 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 7 May 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(2) - 23 Mar 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 6 Jan 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view