Gian Chand Jain& Anr. vs. State Of Haryana And Ors. Thr. Its Financial Secretary And Principal Secretary Government Of Haryana Industries Department
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Ordinary
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
Other [BEFORE HON. CHAMBER]
Listed On:
27 Oct 2017
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Item No.68
REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV-B
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2222/2012 GIAN CHAND JAIN AND ANR. & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. & ORS. $Respondent(s)$ (ONLY SLP(C) NO.2222/2012 IS TO BE LISTED BEFORE LD. REGISTRAR)
WITH SLP(C) No. $40014/2012$ (IV-B) (IA No.61747/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS) $\begin{array}{cccccc}\n0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 &$ $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \cup \mathcal{L}$ $\mathbf{L}$ $\sim$
| Date : 27-10-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Karunesh Kumar Shukla, Adv.<br>Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. V. D. Khanna, AOR | ||||||
| Ms. Ragya V. Singh, Adv. | ||||||
| Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora, AOR | ||||||
| Ms. Ragya V.Singh, Adv. | ||||||
| M/s Mittr and Mitter Co., Advs. | ||||||
| Mr. Satinder S. Gulati, Adv. | ||||||
| Ms. Kamaldeep Gulati, Adv. |
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. S. S. Khandusa, AOR Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, AOR Mr. S. Shantanu, Adv. Mr. S.Pratap S., Adv.
Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, AOR Mr. Prashant Kumar, AOR Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR Mr. Karunesh Kumar Shukla,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the unserved respondents.
However, Ld.Counsel for the petitioners submits that he intends to withdraw SLP(C) No. 2222/2012 and he would be filing an application in this regard within a weeks time. If such application is filed and is in order, place the same before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for orders.
SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar
MG