Gian Chand Jain& Anr. vs. State Of Haryana And Ors. Thr. Its Financial Secretary And Principal Secretary Government Of Haryana Industries Department

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Arun Mishra
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:20 Mar 2013
CNR:SCIN010350932011

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

12 Jan 2012

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.26 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2222/2012 GIAN CHAND JAIN & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE ADDL. GROUNDS,permission to file additional documents and prayer for interim relief and office report ) WITH SLP(C) NO. 40014 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 20/03/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Prasenjit Keswani, Adv. Mrs V.D. Khanna,Adv. Mr Prashant Narang, Adv. M/S Mitter & Mitter Co. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) NO.2222/2012 On behalf of respondent No.1, the ld. Counsel, Ms Anubha Agarwal has accepted notice and has undertaken to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit by next date. On behalf of respondent nos. 8 and 9, on the last date itself, the ld. Counsel had accepted notice and had undertaken to file vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit, but today again on behalf of respondent No.8 only, the ld. Counsel, Mr Aman Preet Singh Rahu appearing on behalf of Mr A Venayagan Balan, Advocate-on-record has made the same -2- Item No.26 request. Four weeks' time is granted for necessary compliance. Respondent No.3 is represented through the ld. Counsel but as per office report there were certain defects in the vakalatnama which are not yet cured. Omission be rectified by next date without fail. Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 are reported to be duly served through post but none appeared nor any steps taken on their behalf. Notices be re issued to respondent Nos. 5 to 7 and 10 to 12 on filing process fee and fresh addresses through the concerned District Court in addition to postal service. SLP(C) NO.40014/2012 On behalf of respondent no.1, the ld. Counsel, Ms Anubha Agarwal has accepted notice and undertaken to file vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit by next date. Four weeks' time is granted. Service report in respect of respondent no.2 is awaited. List again on 30.4.2013.

n

| | |(M.A.SAYEED) | | | |REGISTRAR |

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(55) - 13 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(54) - 6 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(53) - 27 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(52) - 11 Aug 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(51) - 4 Aug 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(50) - 26 Jul 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(49) - 10 Jul 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(47) - 4 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(48) - 4 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(45) - 5 Dec 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(46) - 5 Dec 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(42) - 7 Oct 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(43) - 7 Oct 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(44) - 7 Oct 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(39) - 2 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(40) - 2 Sept 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(41) - 2 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(36) - 26 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(37) - 26 Jul 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(38) - 26 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(32) - 3 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(33) - 3 Mar 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(34) - 3 Mar 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(35) - 3 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(29) - 7 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(30) - 7 Jan 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(31) - 7 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 29 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(27) - 29 Oct 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 29 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 11 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 11 Aug 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 11 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 6 May 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 6 May 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 26 Mar 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 26 Mar 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 9 Feb 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 9 Feb 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 9 Dec 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 10 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 21 Jul 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 1 Apr 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 20 Jan 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 9 Dec 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 1 Nov 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 23 Sept 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 26 Aug 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 15 Jul 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 30 Apr 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 20 Mar 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(4) - 12 Feb 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 15 Jan 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 9 May 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 30 Jan 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data