Gian Chand Jain& Anr. vs. State Of Haryana And Ors. Thr. Its Financial Secretary And Principal Secretary Government Of Haryana Industries Department
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
12 Jan 2012
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SECTION IV B
Listed on 29.10.2015 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Court No. R1 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Item No. 10
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL)NO. 2222 OF 2012
WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF
Gian Chand Jain & Anr. ...Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors. ...Respondent(s)
OFFICE REPORT
The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 11.08.2015 when the following order was passed :
"Service is complete in respect of respondent nos. 4,5,7 and 11 but none has entered appearance.
Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 1,2 and 10 is already on record.
Counter affidavit though filed in respect of respondent nos. 3,8 and 9 but defects pointed out by the registry have not been cured despite order. However, as last opportunity four weeks time is granted for the same.
Office report is silent with regard to counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 6,12. Put up with proper office report by the next date of hearing. List again on 29.10.2015."
It is submitted that there are 12 respondents. Respondent Nos. 12, 3, 89, 6 & 12 and 10 are represented thorugh M/s Kamal Mohan Gupta, Ravindra Bana, Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, B. K. Satija and Neeraj Sekhar, Advocates respectively. Respondent Nos. 4, 5, 7 and 11 have not chosen to enter appearance though served with notice.
It is further submitted that Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos. 12, Mr. Ravindra Bana, Advocate for respondent No. 3, Mr. R. P. Goel, Advocate for respondent Nos. 89 and Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, Advocate for respondent No. 10 have filed counter affidavits.
It is further submitted that Mr. B. K. Satija, Advocate for respondent Nos. 6 & 12 has not not filed counter affidavit so far.
It is further submitted that pursuant to the aforesaid order Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Advocate for respondent Nos. 89 has filed proof of service regarding counter affidavit, thus defects of counter affidavit has been cured.
It is further submitted that Mr. Ravindra Bana, Advocate for respondent No. 3 has not cured the defects of vakalatnama so far.
The matter is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report.
Dated this the 28th day of October, 2015.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to: Mrs. V. D. Khanna, Advocate. Mr. Ravindra Bana, Advocate. Mr. R. P. Goel, Advocate. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Advocate. Mr. B. K. Satija, Advocate. Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, Advocate.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Rajesh