Gian Chand Jain& Anr. vs. State Of Haryana And Ors. Thr. Its Financial Secretary And Principal Secretary Government Of Haryana Industries Department

V ITEM NO.23 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2222/2012 GIAN CHAND JAIN & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 06/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth Kaushik, Adv. Mrs V. D. Khanna,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. A. Venayagam Balan,Adv. Mr. B. K. Satija,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Pratap Shanker, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Shekhar,Adv. Mr. Aman Preet Rahi, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. Mr. Aditya Soni, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of respondent Nos.2, 4, 5, 7 and 11 is complete but none has entered appearance. There are 12 respondents in all. Respondent No.3 has filed the vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit but defects as noticed therein have yet not been cured. Be cured within three weeks' time. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2015.05.18 11:54:44 IST Reason: Counter affidavit has been filed by respondent Nos.8 and 9 but both these respondents are represented by two different counsel. Necessary correction be made. Item No.23 -2-

It is mentioned by the Ld. Counsel for respondent No.10 that counter affidavit on his behalf has also been filed.

Registry to check and to take the same on record.

List again on 11.8.2015.

(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar