Gian Chand Jain& Anr. vs. State Of Haryana And Ors. Thr. Its Financial Secretary And Principal Secretary Government Of Haryana Industries Department

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Arun Mishra
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:1 Apr 2014
CNR:SCIN010350932011

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

12 Jan 2012

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

@ ITEM NO.26 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2222/2012 GIAN CHAND JAIN & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for PERMISSION TO FILE ADDL. GROUNDS,permission to file additional documents and prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) NO. 40014 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 01/04/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prasenjit Keswani, Adv. Mrs V.D. Khanna,Adv. Mr.Yashraj Singh Deora, Adv. M/S Mitter & Mitter Co. For Respondent(s) Mr. Aman Preet Singh Rahi, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar,Adv. Mr. A.Venayagam Balan ,Adv Mr. Manjit Singh, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta ,Adv Mr. B.K.Satija ,Adv Mr. Pratap Shankar, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Shekhar ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No.2222/2012 Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 has already come on record. The learned counsel for respondent No.3 to cure the defects in the vakalatnama within four weeks. Counter affidavit has been already filed on record by him. Item No.26 -2- Respondent Nos.9, 6 and 12 are granted six weeks' time for filing counter affidavit on record subject to service of the complete set of the pleadings on the learned counsel appearing on their behalf within two weeks of which necessary proof be filed on record. Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.10 has already come on record. Service report in respect of respondent Nos.5 and 11 is awaited (notice issued on 14.3.2014). SLP(C) NO. 40014 of 2012 Six weeks' time is granted to respondent No.1 for filing counter affidavit subject to service of the complete set of the pleadings on the learned counsel appearing on his behalf within two weeks of which necessary proof be filed on record. Respondent No.2 is reported to be duly and properly served through the Trial Court but none appeared on his behalf. List again on 21.7.2014. | | | (M.A. SAYEED) | | | |REGISTRAR | | | | | rd

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(55) - 13 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(54) - 6 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(53) - 27 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(52) - 11 Aug 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(51) - 4 Aug 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(50) - 26 Jul 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(49) - 10 Jul 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(47) - 4 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(48) - 4 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(45) - 5 Dec 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(46) - 5 Dec 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(42) - 7 Oct 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(43) - 7 Oct 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(44) - 7 Oct 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(39) - 2 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(40) - 2 Sept 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(41) - 2 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(36) - 26 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(37) - 26 Jul 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(38) - 26 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(32) - 3 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(33) - 3 Mar 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(34) - 3 Mar 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(35) - 3 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(29) - 7 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(30) - 7 Jan 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(31) - 7 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 29 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(27) - 29 Oct 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 29 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 11 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 11 Aug 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 11 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 6 May 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 6 May 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 26 Mar 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 26 Mar 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 9 Feb 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 9 Feb 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 9 Dec 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 10 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 21 Jul 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 1 Apr 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(12) - 20 Jan 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 9 Dec 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 1 Nov 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 23 Sept 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 26 Aug 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 15 Jul 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 30 Apr 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 20 Mar 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 12 Feb 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 15 Jan 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 9 May 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 30 Jan 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data