Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Bela M. Trivedi
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:14 Nov 2022
CNR:SCIN010350682022

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

Before:

Hon'ble A.S. Bopanna, Hon'ble Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

Stage:

FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

Notice

Listed On:

14 Nov 2022

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.13 SECTION XVII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No(s). 8175/2022

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED Appellant(s)

VERSUS

CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No.167492/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.167493/2022-EX-PARTE STAY )

WITH C.A. No. 8136/2022 (XVII)

( IA No.167100/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.167101/2022-EX-PARTE STAY)

Date : 14-11-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA

For Appellant(s) Mr. K.V. Viswanathan, Sr. Adv. Mr. M.G. Ramachandran, Sr, Adv. Ms. Poorva Saigal, Adv. Mr. Nikunj Dayal, AOR Mr. Shubham Arya, Adv. Mr. Ravi Nair, Adv. Ms. Srishti Khindaria, Adv. Mr. Aneesh Bajaj, Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sajan Poovayya, Sr. Adv. Mr. Hemant Sahai, Adv. Mr. Shreshth Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR Ms. Neel Rahate, Adv. Mr. Karun Sharma, Adv. Mr. Wahengbam Immanuel Meitei, Adv. Mr. Anand Ganesan, Adv. (R-5,6 and 7) Ms. Jesal Wahi, AOR Mr. Amal Nair, Adv. Mr. Sugandh Khanna, Adv. Digitally signed by Nisha Khulbey Date: 2022.11.16 11:36:08 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

1. Issue notice to the respondent(s).

2. The counsel for respondent no.2 has entered caveat. Hence, service of notice with respect to the respondent no.2 is waived off. Let notice be issued to the other remaining respondent(s).

3. In the meanwhile, having taken note of the order impugned, to balance equities, we find it appropriate to grant stay of the order impugned herein, subject to the condition that the appellant(s) shall deposit 50% of the fixed charges before the Commission. The said amount shall be kept in an interest bearing deposit in a Nationalized Bank for a period of six months and shall be renewed from time to time until further orders. The interest accrued on the amount, would enure to the benefit of the succeeding parties.

4. The pendency of this petition shall not be an impediment for the Commission to either dispose of the matter, which has been heard and reserved on the same subject matter or for the Tribunal to consider the appeal, which is the subject matter of these matters on its merits and in accordance with law. All contentions of the parties in that regard are left open.

5. Since, the learned senior counsel for the appellant(s) submits that a portion of the amount has been deposited by them before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, the appellant(s) are granted liberty to withdraw and deposit the same before the Commission in compliance of this Order.

(NISHA KHULBEY) (DIPTI KHURANA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

2

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(4) - 20 Mar 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 13 Mar 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 14 Nov 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(1) - 3 Nov 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search