Kankipati Anupama vs. The State Of Telangana

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 21099-21100/2023

KANKIPATI ANUPAMA & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

SLP(C) Nos. 17224-17225/2023 (XII-A)

SLP(C) Nos. 21101-21102/2023 (XII-A)

Date : 29-08-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI [IN CHAMBERS]

For Petitioner(s) Ms. Praseena Elizabeth Joseph, AOR

M/S. Lawyer S Knit & Co, AOR Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Mr. Tushar Singh, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Arora, Adv. Mr. Katubadi Ismail, Adv.

Ms. Rao Vishwaja, Adv. Mr. P. Vamshi Rao, Adv. Ms. Tatini Basu, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. D.rama Krishna Reddy, Adv. Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. Ms. Adviteeya Sharma, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Digitally signed by SNEHA DAS Date: 2024.08.31 15:25:14 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

SLP(C) Nos. 21099-21100/2023

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) states that there is discrepancy in the office report and he

ITEM NO.1771 COURT NO.10 SECTION XII-A

may be allowed to file a proper reply.

Two weeks time is granted to state the anomalies noted by the counsel in the office report.

SLP(C) Nos. 17224-17225/2023

At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner(s), four more weeks time is granted to carryout service of notice on respondent Nos. 10, 16 and 17.

List thereafter.

SLP(C) Nos. 21101-21102/2023

At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner(s), four weeks time is granted to file substituted service on unserved respondent Nos. 16 to 19, 22, 26, 28, 31 and 35.

List thereafter.

(SNEHA DAS) (DIVYA BABBAR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)