Chandrakant N Galdhar vs. Anand

COURT NO.6

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NO(S). 34868/2024

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-04-2024 in WP No. 16/2024, WP No. 1571/2024, WP No. 15/2024 and WP No. 801/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Aurangabad)

CHANDRAKANT N. GALDHAR & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

ANAND & ORS. ETC.

Respondent $(s)$

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.178857/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.178860/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

WITH

DIARY NO(S). 35257/2024 [ITEM NO.68] No.179193/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN (IA FILING and $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ No.179195/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

Diary No(s). 35569/2024 (IX) [ITEM NO.68.1] No.180440/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING (IA and $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ No.180443/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.180444/2024-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

Date: 20-08-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

For Petitioner(s)	Mr. Shyam Diwan, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Sharanagouda Patil, Adv.<br>Mr. Yashewender Singh, Adv.
	Ms. Supreeta Sharanagouda, AOR
	Dr. S. Muralidhar, Sr. Adv.
	Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR
	Mr. Geo Joseph, Adv.
	Mr. Risvi Muhammed, Adv.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by<br>ASHISH KOMDLE<br>Date: 2024-08.21	Mr. Shashibhushan P. Adgaonkar, AOR
18:26:26 IST<br>Reason	Mr. Omkar Jayant Deshpande, Adv.
	Mrs. Pradnya S Adgaonkar, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. M.Y. Deshmukh, AOR Mr. Vikram S. Kadam, Adv. Ms. Manjeet Kirpal, Adv. Ms. Adviteeya Sharma, Adv. Ms. Manisha Singh, Adv. Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Amol Nirmalkumar Suryawanshi, AOR Ms. Srishty Pandey, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Chaturvedi, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

DIARY NO(S). 34868/2024 [ITEM NO.31]

Delay condoned.

After having heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the parties, we find that an equitable view has been taken by the High Court in the larger interests of the beneficiaries of the Trust which is running educational institutions.

The Special Leave Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.

Pending application stands disposed of accordingly.

DIARY NO(S). 35257/2024 AND DIARY NO(S). 35569/2024 [ITEM NOS.68 AND 68.1]

When this Court was not inclined to entertain these Special Leave Petitions, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in these Petitions state that the petitioners will adopt appropriate remedies. They seek permission to withdraw the Special Leave Petitions.

The Special Leave Petitions are, accordingly, disposed of as withdrawn.

(ASHISH KONDLE) (AVGV RAMU)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

2