Muthuvel Palani. M vs. The Director (Cbi) Office Of The Central Bureau Investigation
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble A.M. Khanwilkar, Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Listed On:
30 Jan 2020
In:
Chamber
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
147433/2019,147437/2019,147438/2019,147440/2019,162976/2019,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 34701/2019 IN SLP(Crl.) No.9998/2017
MUTHUVEL PALANI.M Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE DIRECTOR (CBI) OFFICE OF THE CENTRAL BUREAU INVESTIGATION Respondent(s)
(IA No. 147438/2019 - APPLICATION FOR LISTING REVIEW PETITION IN OPEN COURT, IA No. 162976/2019 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS, IA No. 147437/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REVIEW PETITION, IA No. 147433/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 147440/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 30-01-2020 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
By Circulation
UPON perusing the papers the Court made the following O R D E R
Application for hearing the Review Petition in open court is rejected.
The Review Petition is dismissed on the ground of delay as well as merits.
Pending applications stand disposed of.
[ CHARANJEET KAUR ] [ INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL ] A.R.-cum-P.S. ASSTT. REGISTRAR
[ Signed order is placed on the file ]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (CRL.) NO. OF 2020 D.NO. 34701/2019
IN
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO. 9998 OF 2017
MUTHUVEL PALANI.M PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
THE DIRECTOR (CBI) OFFICE OF THE CENTRAL BUREAU INVESTIGATION RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
Application for hearing the Review Petition in open court is rejected.
There is delay of 418 days in filing the Review Petition for which no satisfactory explanation has been given. Even otherwise, we do not find any merit in the Review Petition. The Review Petition is dismissed on the ground of delay as well as merits.
.................CJI. [ S.A. BOBDE ]
...................J. [ A.M. KHANWILKAR ]
........………………………..........J. DR DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD ]
NEW DELHI, JANUARY 30, 2020.