Pramesh Ch. Mohapatra vs. The State Of Odisha State Of Odisha Commissioner Cum Secretary To Govt
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SLP(C) 35237/14
1
ITEM NO.11 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.35237/2014
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16/05/2014 in WPC No. 17476/2009 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack)
DAMODAR CHAYANI & ORS Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF ORISSA & ORS Respondent(s)
(With appln. (s) for clarification/modification of court's order)
WITH C.A. Nos.1148-1150/2011 (With interim relief and office report) C.A. No.1152-1154/2011 (With interim relief and office report) C.A. Nos.1161-1169/2011 (With interim relief and office report) S.L.P.(C) No.35239/2014 (With appln.(s) for clarification/modification of court's order and office report) S.L.P.(C) No.35241/2014 (With appln.(s) for clarification/modification of court's order and office report) C.A. No.1144-1146/2011 (With office report)
Date: 09/03/2015 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT
For Petitioner(s) | Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv. |
---|---|
Mr. Prashanto Chandra Sen, Adv. | |
Ms. Anushriti, Adv. | |
Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, AOR | |
Mr. Rajeev Singh, AOR | |
Mr. Suresh Chandra Tripathy, AOR |
For Respondent(s) Mr. Ranjit Kumar, S.G. Mr. B.B. Sawhney, Sr. Adv. Mr. D.L. Chidanand, Adv. Ms. Movita, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balram Das, Adv. Mr. Akhil Sibal, Adv. Mr. Deepak Khurana, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mishra, Adv. Mr. Umesh Kumar Khaitan, AOR Mr. Raj Kumar Mehta, AOR Mr. Elangbam Premjit Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Rutwik Panda, AOR Mr. Ajit Pudussery, AOR Mr. K. Vijayan, Adv. Ms. Shruti S. Hazarika, Adv. Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra, Adv. Ms. Apurva Upmanyu, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
It is submitted at the Bar that C.A. Nos.1144-1146/2011, C.A. Nos.1148-1150/2011, C.A. Nos.1152-1154/2011 and C.A. Nos.1161-1169/2011, being different, should be de-tagged from the bunch of present special leave petitions and be listed before the appropriate Bench.
As far as the special leave petitions are concerned, they be listed before a Bench, wherein one of us (Dipak Misra, J.) is not a member.
Registry is directed to do the needful.
(Chetan Kumar) Court Master (Tapan Kumar Chakraborty) Court Master
SLP(C) 35237/14
3