Hand In Hand India vs. Superintendent Of Police

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:1 Dec 2016
CNR:SCIN010346242016

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

22 Oct 2016

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

vITEM NO.2 COURT NO.6 SECTION IIC S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8197/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01/09/2016 in MPSR No. 49348/2015 in MP No. 1/2015 in CRLOP No. 25554/2014 passed by the High Court of Madras) M/S. HAND IN HAND INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 8545/2016 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report) SLP(Crl) No. 8220/2016 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date: 01/12/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv. Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Mr. Arunava Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. Pratiksha Mishra, Adv. Ms. Vaishnavi Subrahmanyam, Adv. Ms. Srishti Govil, Adv. For Respondent(s) For R/4 Mr. Guru Krishnakumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. A. Nagarajan, Adv. Mr. A. Radhakrishnan, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard the learned Senior counsel appearing for the parties. Delay is condoned in Special Leave Petition(Crl.) No. 8545/2016. -2- Mr. Shekhar Naphade, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner makes a statement before us that he would file a protest petition before the concerned trial court and seeks permission to withdraw the Special Leave Petitions. In view of the request made by the learned Senior counsel, the Special Leave Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. We direct the concerned Trial Court to deal with and dispose of the Protest Petition, which would be filed by the petitioner, independently and in accordance with the provisions of law without being influenced by any of the observations made by the High Court in the present matter. Before parting with these matters, we make it very clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the concerned Trial Court shall deal with the matter independently and in accordance with the provisions of law. (VISHAL ANAND) (SNEH LATA SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(12) - 1 Dec 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 1 Dec 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(10) - 30 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 30 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 28 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 28 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 21 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 21 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 21 Nov 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 21 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 21 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 28 Oct 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 28 Oct 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view